Every week we ask ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini the questions real UK consumers ask about consumer electronics & appliances — and record exactly which brands they put forward. Right now, Very owns the conversation.
0 AI answers this run · 0 brands named · measured, never estimated
Named in 17% of consumer electronics & appliances answers, typically in position 2.3. Amazon follows at 12%, Currys at 12%.
Visibility is the share of answers naming the brand; citation share is its slice of all brand-owned pages cited; read→cited is how often its pages convert a read into a citation.
| # | Brand | Visibility | Avg. position | Citation share | Read→cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Very | 17% | 2.3 | 0% | — |
| 2 | Amazon | 12% | 2.3 | 3% | 50% |
| 3 | Currys | 12% | 2.6 | 26% | 21% |
| 4 | Scan | 10% | 1.3 | 0% | — |
| 5 | Samsung | 10% | 2.2 | 0% | 0% |
| 6 | AO | 8% | 1.6 | 19% | 25% |
| 7 | AO Recycling | 8% | 1.6 | 0% | — |
| 8 | AO Retail | 8% | 1.6 | 0% | — |
| 9 | Box | 8% | 2.2 | 3% | — |
| 10 | Appliances Direct | 8% | 3.8 | 23% | 63% |
| 11 | Apple | 7% | 2.0 | 0% | — |
| 12 | Argos | 7% | 3.3 | 10% | 17% |
| 13 | John Lewis | 5% | 2.0 | 10% | 67% |
| 14 | Marks Electrical | 2% | 5.0 | 6% | 100% |
| 15 | Costco | 0% | — | 0% | 0% |
Being named is visibility. Underneath it, every answer describes a brand in three ways — how much it stands out, how much it belongs, and how much it is returned to. In consumer electronics & appliances, Apple leads attraction at 143 against RGB Direct at 82, indexed on the category at 100.
Each whorl lights one ring per index threshold cleared. See the full consumer electronics & appliances desire edition →
The independent sources AI models cite when answering consumer electronics & appliances questions — the places a brand needs to be seen, reviewed and ranked.
When Claude or ChatGPT opens a brand's own pages while answering, does the page make the cited-sources list? John Lewis converts 67% of reads; Samsung just 0%. That gap is a content problem, not a visibility problem.
| # | Brand | Visibility | Avg. position | Citation share | Read→cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Very | 17% | 2.3 | 0% | — |
| 2 | Amazon | 12% | 2.3 | 3% | 50% |
| 3 | Currys | 12% | 2.6 | 26% | 21% |
| 4 | Scan | 10% | 1.3 | 0% | — |
| 5 | Samsung | 10% | 2.2 | 0% | 0% |
| 6 | AO | 8% | 1.6 | 19% | 25% |
| 7 | AO Recycling | 8% | 1.6 | 0% | — |
| 8 | AO Retail | 8% | 1.6 | 0% | — |
| 9 | Box | 8% | 2.2 | 3% | — |
| 10 | Appliances Direct | 8% | 3.8 | 23% | 63% |
| 11 | Apple | 7% | 2.0 | 0% | — |
| 12 | Argos | 7% | 3.3 | 10% | 17% |
| 13 | John Lewis | 5% | 2.0 | 10% | 67% |
| 14 | Marks Electrical | 2% | 5.0 | 6% | 100% |
| 15 | Costco | 0% | — | 0% | 0% |
Ask about consumer electronics & appliances and the brand you are shown depends on the assistant: Claude → Appliances Direct, Gemini → Very, ChatGPT → Very. Their top-five lists share just 0% of names.
Brands whose visibility swings most between models — the bar per model, widest gap on the right.
| Brand | Claude | Gemini | ChatGPT | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Very | 0% | 25% | 25% | 25pp |
| Box | 0% | 20% | 5% | 20pp |
| Currys | 0% | 15% | 20% | 20pp |
| Amazon | 5% | 20% | 10% | 15pp |
| Apple | 0% | 15% | 5% | 15pp |
| Argos | 0% | 5% | 15% | 15pp |
| John Lewis | 5% | 0% | 10% | 10pp |
| Scan | 5% | 15% | 10% | 10pp |
| AO Retail | 5% | 15% | 5% | 10pp |
| AO | 5% | 15% | 5% | 10pp |
Method: 20 unbranded consumer prompts per category, spread across the buying journey, run weekly against ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini. Read→cited uses Claude and ChatGPT only (Gemini does not separate the two). Correlational observations of model behaviour at the time of the run. Data from the run completed Wed, 02 Sep 2026 09:21:06 GMT.