Every week we ask ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini the questions real UK consumers ask about cloud storage & web hosting — and record exactly which brands they put forward. Right now, Google Drive owns the conversation.
0 AI answers this run · 0 brands named · measured, never estimated
Named in 53% of cloud storage & web hosting answers, typically in position 2.9. Apple iCloud follows at 50%, Sync.com at 50%.
Visibility is the share of answers naming the brand; citation share is its slice of all brand-owned pages cited; read→cited is how often its pages convert a read into a citation.
| # | Brand | Visibility | Avg. position | Citation share | Read→cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Google Drive | 53% | 2.9 | 15% | 24% |
| 2 | Apple iCloud | 50% | 3.1 | 9% | 43% |
| 3 | Sync.com | 50% | 4.4 | 0% | 0% |
| 4 | Microsoft OneDrive | 48% | 3.4 | 9% | 29% |
| 5 | Dropbox | 42% | 4.8 | 6% | 10% |
| 6 | Google Photos | 35% | 4.1 | 0% | — |
| 7 | Google One | 27% | 3.9 | 0% | — |
| 8 | GitHub Pages | 17% | 3.7 | 14% | 33% |
| 9 | Backblaze | 15% | 4.3 | 2% | 8% |
| 10 | pCloud | 15% | 5.6 | 3% | 100% |
| 11 | Idrive | 12% | 5.4 | 2% | 17% |
| 12 | Vercel | 12% | 5.4 | 0% | — |
| 13 | Hostinger | 10% | 1.5 | 5% | 29% |
| 14 | Netlify | 10% | 4.8 | 0% | — |
| 15 | Proton Drive | 10% | 5.3 | 5% | 17% |
Being named is visibility. Underneath it, every answer describes a brand in three ways — how much it stands out, how much it belongs, and how much it is returned to. In cloud storage & web hosting, Cloudflare leads affinity at 125 against Terabox at 75, indexed on the category at 100.
Each whorl lights one ring per index threshold cleared. See the full cloud storage & web hosting desire edition →
The independent sources AI models cite when answering cloud storage & web hosting questions — the places a brand needs to be seen, reviewed and ranked.
When Claude or ChatGPT opens a brand's own pages while answering, does the page make the cited-sources list? Apple iCloud converts 43% of reads; Sync.com just 0%. That gap is a content problem, not a visibility problem.
| # | Brand | Visibility | Avg. position | Citation share | Read→cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Google Drive | 53% | 2.9 | 15% | 24% |
| 2 | Apple iCloud | 50% | 3.1 | 9% | 43% |
| 3 | Sync.com | 50% | 4.4 | 0% | 0% |
| 4 | Microsoft OneDrive | 48% | 3.4 | 9% | 29% |
| 5 | Dropbox | 42% | 4.8 | 6% | 10% |
| 6 | Google Photos | 35% | 4.1 | 0% | — |
| 7 | Google One | 27% | 3.9 | 0% | — |
| 8 | GitHub Pages | 17% | 3.7 | 14% | 33% |
| 9 | Backblaze | 15% | 4.3 | 2% | 8% |
| 10 | pCloud | 15% | 5.6 | 3% | 100% |
| 11 | Idrive | 12% | 5.4 | 2% | 17% |
| 12 | Vercel | 12% | 5.4 | 0% | — |
| 13 | Hostinger | 10% | 1.5 | 5% | 29% |
| 14 | Netlify | 10% | 4.8 | 0% | — |
| 15 | Proton Drive | 10% | 5.3 | 5% | 17% |
Ask about cloud storage & web hosting and the brand you are shown depends on the assistant: Claude → Sync.com, Gemini → Google Drive, ChatGPT → Apple iCloud. Their top-five lists share just 67% of names.
Brands whose visibility swings most between models — the bar per model, widest gap on the right.
| Brand | Claude | Gemini | ChatGPT | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft OneDrive | 30% | 60% | 55% | 30pp |
| Google One | 10% | 30% | 40% | 30pp |
| Apple iCloud | 35% | 55% | 60% | 25pp |
| Google Photos | 20% | 45% | 40% | 25pp |
| Google Drive | 45% | 65% | 50% | 20pp |
| Dropbox | 30% | 45% | 50% | 20pp |
| GitHub Pages | 5% | 20% | 25% | 20pp |
| Vercel | 5% | 25% | 5% | 20pp |
| pCloud | 20% | 20% | 5% | 15pp |
| SiteGround | 15% | 10% | 0% | 15pp |
Every page AI opened while answering, classified by what kind of page it is. Comparisons supply the most citations; Listicles convert best — 100% of the ones models opened were actually cited.
| Page type | Cited | Read but not cited | Conversion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comparisons | 51 | 8 | 86% |
| How-to guides | 43 | 9 | 83% |
| pricing | 22 | 13 | 63% |
| Editorial | 22 | 8 | 73% |
| Documentation | 21 | 18 | 54% |
| Listicles | 10 | 0 | 100% |
| Community threads | 9 | 6 | 60% |
| Product pages | 8 | 10 | 44% |
Of the cloud storage & web hosting pages models actually opened, how much more often each feature's pages ended up in the cited sources. Structured data is worth 30 percentage points; hard statistics pages fare 7pp worse. Measured within the read population, so selection can't flatter it.
| Feature | Pages with | Cited % | Pages without | Cited % | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Structured data | 392 | 81% | 161 | 51% | +30pp |
| Named author | 271 | 82% | 282 | 62% | +20pp |
| Updated this year | 241 | 81% | 312 | 65% | +17pp |
| Comparison table | 212 | 79% | 341 | 67% | +12pp |
| Specifications | 51 | 75% | 502 | 72% | +3pp |
| Answer up front | 149 | 69% | 404 | 73% | -4pp |
| Hard statistics | 133 | 67% | 420 | 74% | -7pp |
Readiness scores each brand's own pages on the structure models reward — a direct answer up front, tables, hard numbers, named authors, structured data, recency, specifications. IONOS is the widest gap: well-built pages that still aren't converting into citations.
| Brand | Readiness | Pages cited | Pages profiled |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proton Drive | 46 | 57% | 7 |
| Hostinger | 45 | 38% | 13 |
| Replit | 42 | 33% | 3 |
| IONOS | 41 | 5% | 44 |
| Mega | 41 | 75% | 4 |
| Modal | 33 | 33% | 3 |
| GoDaddy | 33 | 20% | 5 |
| OVHcloud | 30 | 40% | 5 |
| Cloudflare | 29 | 31% | 26 |
| Idrive | 29 | 8% | 12 |
Readiness is the share of eight measurable structural signals present on a brand's profiled pages. It is a build-quality measure, not a ranking of the brand.
Read straight off the pages AI cited: the consumer questions cited content answers most often. Content that fails to settle these is content models have no reason to quote.
Method: 20 unbranded consumer prompts per category, spread across the buying journey, run weekly against ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini. Read→cited uses Claude and ChatGPT only (Gemini does not separate the two). Correlational observations of model behaviour at the time of the run. Data from the run completed Wed, 02 Sep 2026 08:26:55 GMT.