Every week we ask ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini the questions real UK consumers ask about food delivery — and record exactly which brands they put forward. Right now, Deliveroo owns the conversation.
0 AI answers this run · 0 brands named · measured, never estimated
Named in 65% of food delivery answers, typically in position 1.8. Uber Eats follows at 65%, Just Eat at 62%.
Visibility is the share of answers naming the brand; citation share is its slice of all brand-owned pages cited; read→cited is how often its pages convert a read into a citation.
| # | Brand | Visibility | Avg. position | Citation share | Read→cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Deliveroo | 65% | 1.8 | 13% | 12% |
| 2 | Uber Eats | 65% | 2.1 | 35% | 20% |
| 3 | Just Eat | 62% | 2.6 | 8% | 8% |
| 4 | Tesco | 15% | 2.7 | 10% | 75% |
| 5 | Ocado | 8% | 3.4 | 3% | 100% |
| 6 | Morrisons | 8% | 4.4 | 0% | 0% |
| 7 | Asda | 8% | 5.4 | 5% | 100% |
| 8 | Foodhub | 7% | 4.0 | 3% | — |
| 9 | Sainsbury's | 5% | 5.7 | 8% | 50% |
| 10 | Co-op | 5% | 7.3 | 0% | — |
| 11 | DoorDash | 3% | 2.0 | 0% | — |
| 12 | Eat Local | 3% | 3.0 | 5% | 100% |
| 13 | AllTap | 3% | 3.5 | 5% | 25% |
| 14 | Beelivery | 3% | 3.5 | 0% | — |
| 15 | Gopuff | 3% | 5.0 | 3% | — |
Being named is visibility. Underneath it, every answer describes a brand in three ways — how much it stands out, how much it belongs, and how much it is returned to. In food delivery, Deliveroo leads affinity at 121 against Just Eat at 74, indexed on the category at 100.
Each whorl lights one ring per index threshold cleared. See the full food delivery desire edition →
An assistant does not answer from memory alone. It runs its own web searches first, and whoever it searches for is the shortlist it then chooses from. Across 80 searches in food delivery, Deliveroo is named in 34% of the ones that name a brand at all. ChatGPT Web, Copilot do not report their searches, so these shares are measured against the ones that do.
These are the assistants' own searches, read from their answers — not what anyone typed into a search engine.
The independent sources AI models cite when answering food delivery questions — the places a brand needs to be seen, reviewed and ranked.
When Claude or ChatGPT opens a brand's own pages while answering, does the page make the cited-sources list? Tesco converts 75% of reads; Just Eat just 8%. That gap is a content problem, not a visibility problem.
| # | Brand | Visibility | Avg. position | Citation share | Read→cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Deliveroo | 65% | 1.8 | 13% | 12% |
| 2 | Uber Eats | 65% | 2.1 | 35% | 20% |
| 3 | Just Eat | 62% | 2.6 | 8% | 8% |
| 4 | Tesco | 15% | 2.7 | 10% | 75% |
| 5 | Ocado | 8% | 3.4 | 3% | 100% |
| 6 | Morrisons | 8% | 4.4 | 0% | 0% |
| 7 | Asda | 8% | 5.4 | 5% | 100% |
| 8 | Foodhub | 7% | 4.0 | 3% | — |
| 9 | Sainsbury's | 5% | 5.7 | 8% | 50% |
| 10 | Co-op | 5% | 7.3 | 0% | — |
| 11 | DoorDash | 3% | 2.0 | 0% | — |
| 12 | Eat Local | 3% | 3.0 | 5% | 100% |
| 13 | AllTap | 3% | 3.5 | 5% | 25% |
| 14 | Beelivery | 3% | 3.5 | 0% | — |
| 15 | Gopuff | 3% | 5.0 | 3% | — |
Ask about food delivery and the brand you are shown depends on the assistant: Claude → Deliveroo, Gemini → Uber Eats, ChatGPT → Deliveroo. Their top-five lists share just 57% of names.
Brands whose visibility swings most between models — the bar per model, widest gap on the right.
| Brand | Claude | Gemini | ChatGPT | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uber Eats | 70% | 85% | 40% | 45pp |
| Just Eat | 65% | 80% | 40% | 40pp |
| Deliveroo | 70% | 80% | 45% | 35pp |
| Ocado | 15% | 10% | 0% | 15pp |
| Asda | 10% | 15% | 0% | 15pp |
| Tesco | 20% | 15% | 10% | 10pp |
| Sainsbury's | 10% | 5% | 0% | 10pp |
| DoorDash | 10% | 0% | 0% | 10pp |
| Foodhub | 10% | 10% | 0% | 10pp |
| Beelivery | 10% | 0% | 0% | 10pp |
Every page AI opened while answering, classified by what kind of page it is. Editorial supply the most citations; Reviews convert best — 87% of the ones models opened were actually cited.
| Page type | Cited | Read but not cited | Conversion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 103 | 81 | 56% |
| How-to guides | 51 | 47 | 52% |
| Comparisons | 45 | 25 | 64% |
| Community threads | 35 | 17 | 67% |
| Product pages | 33 | 36 | 48% |
| Reviews | 20 | 3 | 87% |
| Other | 18 | 55 | 25% |
| News | 18 | 22 | 45% |
Of the food delivery pages models actually opened, how much more often each feature's pages ended up in the cited sources. Structured data is worth 13 percentage points; cites its sources pages fare 24pp worse. Measured within the read population, so selection can't flatter it.
| Feature | Pages with | Cited % | Pages without | Cited % | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Structured data | 492 | 60% | 576 | 48% | +13pp |
| Named author | 467 | 59% | 601 | 49% | +9pp |
| Hard statistics | 375 | 57% | 693 | 52% | +5pp |
| Updated this year | 316 | 57% | 752 | 52% | +5pp |
| Comparison table | 209 | 54% | 859 | 53% | +0pp |
| Answer up front | 420 | 50% | 648 | 55% | -5pp |
| Cites its sources | 56 | 30% | 1012 | 55% | -24pp |
Readiness scores each brand's own pages on the structure models reward — a direct answer up front, tables, hard numbers, named authors, structured data, recency, specifications. Set against how often those pages are actually cited.
| Brand | Readiness | Pages cited | Pages profiled |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sainsbury's | 34 | 54% | 13 |
| AllTap | 30 | 71% | 14 |
| App4 | 25 | 33% | 3 |
| Waitrose | 21 | 33% | 3 |
| Uber Eats | 18 | 24% | 161 |
| Just Eat | 16 | 32% | 37 |
| Tesco | 16 | 55% | 11 |
| Deliveroo | 14 | 8% | 248 |
| Foodhub | 14 | 30% | 10 |
| Beelivery | 13 | 50% | 4 |
Readiness is the share of eight measurable structural signals present on a brand's profiled pages. It is a build-quality measure, not a ranking of the brand.
Read straight off the pages AI cited: the consumer questions cited content answers most often. Content that fails to settle these is content models have no reason to quote.
Method: 20 unbranded consumer prompts per category, spread across the buying journey, run weekly against ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini. Read→cited uses Claude and ChatGPT only (Gemini does not separate the two). Correlational observations of model behaviour at the time of the run. Data from the run completed Thu, 15 Oct 2026 06:49:07 GMT.