BrandInsightAI Insights
Home · a live data story

Furniture & Homeware,
according to AI

Every week we ask ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini the questions real UK consumers ask about furniture & homeware — and record exactly which brands they put forward. Right now, IKEA owns the conversation.

0 AI answers this run · 0 brands named · measured, never estimated

The podium

IKEA is the default answer.

Named in 27% of furniture & homeware answers, typically in position 2.3. Dunelm follows at 22%, The Range at 17%.

Dunelm
22% of answers
IKEA
27% of answers
The Range
17% of answers
The full board

Every brand AI names, ranked.

Visibility is the share of answers naming the brand; citation share is its slice of all brand-owned pages cited; read→cited is how often its pages convert a read into a citation.

#BrandVisibilityAvg. positionCitation shareRead→cited
1IKEA 27% 2.3 32% 25%
2Dunelm 22% 2.8 18% 31%
3The Range 17% 3.7 14% 22%
4Argos 17% 4.2 8% 17%
5John Lewis 12% 3.6 4% 0%
6B&M 10% 2.8 6% 60%
7Habitat 10% 4.2 0%
8Sainsbury's 10% 4.2 6%
9Next 10% 4.7 4% 0%
10Wayfair 8% 4.0 0% 0%
11Home Bargains 5% 3.0 0%
12Poundland 3% 4.5 0%
13Asda 3% 6.0 0%
14Tesco 3% 7.0 0%
15Matalan 3% 7.5 4%
What AI wants here

IKEA is named most. That is not the same as being wanted.

Being named is visibility. Underneath it, every answer describes a brand in three ways — how much it stands out, how much it belongs, and how much it is returned to. In furniture & homeware, Oliver Bonas leads attraction at 127 against Poundland at 62, indexed on the category at 100.

Attraction
Oliver Bonas127
Poundland62
65-point spread · tracks being named -0.35
Affinity
IKEA119
Poundland73
46-point spread · tracks being named 0.00
Attachment
IKEA112
Poundland83
29-point spread · tracks being named 0.51
IKEA: Attraction 120, Affinity 119, Attachment 112
IKEA
Complete desire
Oliver Bonas: Attraction 127, Affinity 111, Attachment 102
Oliver Bonas
Magnetic but unbought
John Lewis: Attraction 114, Affinity 118, Attachment 108
John Lewis
Complete desire
AttractionAffinityAttachment

Each whorl lights one ring per index threshold cleared. See the full furniture & homeware desire edition →

Who AI trusts here

The referees of furniture & homeware.

The independent sources AI models cite when answering furniture & homeware questions — the places a brand needs to be seen, reviewed and ranked.

reddit.com 9 cites
youtube.com 8 cites
idealhome.co.uk 4 cites
bedfactorydirect.co.uk 3 cites
marksandspencer.com 3 cites
abiinteriors.co.uk 2 cites
archerssleepcentre.co.uk 2 cites
dfs.co.uk 2 cites
houzz.co.uk 2 cites
persil.com 2 cites
Read is not cited

B&M converts reads into citations. Wayfair doesn't.

When Claude or ChatGPT opens a brand's own pages while answering, does the page make the cited-sources list? B&M converts 60% of reads; Wayfair just 0%. That gap is a content problem, not a visibility problem.

B&M · read 5×60%
Dunelm · read 13×31%
IKEA · read 51×25%
The Range · read 18×22%
Argos · read 6×17%
Wayfair · read 4×0%
Full data table
#BrandVisibilityAvg. positionCitation shareRead→cited
1IKEA27%2.332%25%
2Dunelm22%2.818%31%
3The Range17%3.714%22%
4Argos17%4.28%17%
5John Lewis12%3.64%0%
6B&M10%2.86%60%
7Habitat10%4.20%
8Sainsbury's10%4.26%
9Next10%4.74%0%
10Wayfair8%4.00%0%
11Home Bargains5%3.00%
12Poundland3%4.50%
13Asda3%6.00%
14Tesco3%7.00%
15Matalan3%7.54%
Which AI you ask

The models do not agree on who leads.

Ask about furniture & homeware and the brand you are shown depends on the assistant: Claude → Dunelm, Gemini → IKEA, ChatGPT → IKEA. Their top-five lists share just 22% of names.

Claude recommends
Dunelm
named in 20% of its answers
Gemini recommends
IKEA
named in 30% of its answers
ChatGPT recommends
IKEA
named in 35% of its answers

Brands whose visibility swings most between models — the bar per model, widest gap on the right.

Sainsbury's 25pp
Habitat 25pp
IKEA 20pp
John Lewis 15pp
Argos 15pp
Next 15pp
Wayfair 10pp
B&M 10pp
ClaudeGeminiChatGPT
The data behind this chart
BrandClaudeGeminiChatGPTSpread
Sainsbury's5%25%0%25pp
Habitat5%25%0%25pp
IKEA15%30%35%20pp
John Lewis20%10%5%15pp
Argos10%25%15%15pp
Next5%20%5%15pp
Wayfair15%5%5%10pp
B&M5%10%15%10pp
Matalan0%10%0%10pp
Home Bargains0%5%10%10pp
Keep exploring

Nineteen more categories.

Method: 20 unbranded consumer prompts per category, spread across the buying journey, run weekly against ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini. Read→cited uses Claude and ChatGPT only (Gemini does not separate the two). Correlational observations of model behaviour at the time of the run. Data from the run completed Wed, 02 Sep 2026 09:24:05 GMT.

scroll ↓