Every week we ask ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini the questions real UK consumers ask about budget gyms — and record exactly which brands they put forward. Right now, The Gym Group owns the conversation.
0 AI answers this run · 0 brands named · measured, never estimated
Named in 85% of budget gyms answers, typically in position 1.6. PureGym follows at 52%, Better at 35%.
Visibility is the share of answers naming the brand; citation share is its slice of all brand-owned pages cited; read→cited is how often its pages convert a read into a citation.
| # | Brand | Visibility | Avg. position | Citation share | Read→cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Gym Group | 85% | 1.6 | 19% | 17% |
| 2 | PureGym | 52% | 1.4 | 38% | 58% |
| 3 | Better | 35% | 3.1 | 10% | 20% |
| 4 | JD Gyms | 18% | 2.8 | 5% | 100% |
| 5 | Anytime Fitness | 13% | 4.0 | 7% | — |
| 6 | David Lloyd Clubs | 13% | 4.1 | 0% | — |
| 7 | Nuffield Health | 12% | 4.6 | 7% | 100% |
| 8 | DW Fitness First | 7% | 3.3 | 5% | 100% |
| 9 | Third Space | 5% | 5.0 | 0% | — |
| 10 | Energie Fitness | 3% | 4.5 | 2% | — |
| 11 | Snap Fitness | 3% | 5.0 | 2% | — |
| 12 | Fitness4Less | 3% | 5.5 | 0% | — |
| 13 | Virgin Active | 3% | 6.0 | 0% | — |
| 14 | Gymbox | 2% | 2.0 | 2% | 100% |
| 15 | 1Rebel | 2% | 4.0 | 0% | — |
Being named is visibility. Underneath it, every answer describes a brand in three ways — how much it stands out, how much it belongs, and how much it is returned to. In budget gyms, Third Space leads attraction at 123 against DW Fitness First at 90, indexed on the category at 100.
Each whorl lights one ring per index threshold cleared. See the full budget gyms desire edition →
An assistant does not answer from memory alone. It runs its own web searches first, and whoever it searches for is the shortlist it then chooses from. Across 51 searches in budget gyms, The Gym Group is named in 38% of the ones that name a brand at all. ChatGPT Web does not report its searches, so these shares are measured against the ones that do.
These are the assistants' own searches, read from their answers — not what anyone typed into a search engine.
The independent sources AI models cite when answering budget gyms questions — the places a brand needs to be seen, reviewed and ranked.
When Claude or ChatGPT opens a brand's own pages while answering, does the page make the cited-sources list? PureGym converts 58% of reads; The Gym Group just 17%. That gap is a content problem, not a visibility problem.
| # | Brand | Visibility | Avg. position | Citation share | Read→cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Gym Group | 85% | 1.6 | 19% | 17% |
| 2 | PureGym | 52% | 1.4 | 38% | 58% |
| 3 | Better | 35% | 3.1 | 10% | 20% |
| 4 | JD Gyms | 18% | 2.8 | 5% | 100% |
| 5 | Anytime Fitness | 13% | 4.0 | 7% | — |
| 6 | David Lloyd Clubs | 13% | 4.1 | 0% | — |
| 7 | Nuffield Health | 12% | 4.6 | 7% | 100% |
| 8 | DW Fitness First | 7% | 3.3 | 5% | 100% |
| 9 | Third Space | 5% | 5.0 | 0% | — |
| 10 | Energie Fitness | 3% | 4.5 | 2% | — |
| 11 | Snap Fitness | 3% | 5.0 | 2% | — |
| 12 | Fitness4Less | 3% | 5.5 | 0% | — |
| 13 | Virgin Active | 3% | 6.0 | 0% | — |
| 14 | Gymbox | 2% | 2.0 | 2% | 100% |
| 15 | 1Rebel | 2% | 4.0 | 0% | — |
A rare consensus — every model puts The Gym Group first, and their top-five lists overlap 57%. Winning here means winning everywhere at once.
Brands whose visibility swings most between models — the bar per model, widest gap on the right.
| Brand | Claude | Gemini | ChatGPT | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PureGym | 40% | 85% | 30% | 55pp |
| The Gym Group | 65% | 100% | 90% | 35pp |
| David Lloyd Clubs | 0% | 35% | 5% | 35pp |
| Anytime Fitness | 20% | 20% | 0% | 20pp |
| JD Gyms | 15% | 30% | 10% | 20pp |
| Better | 25% | 40% | 40% | 15pp |
| Nuffield Health | 5% | 20% | 10% | 15pp |
| Third Space | 0% | 15% | 0% | 15pp |
| Virgin Active | 0% | 10% | 0% | 10pp |
| Snap Fitness | 0% | 10% | 0% | 10pp |
Every page AI opened while answering, classified by what kind of page it is. Editorial supply the most citations; Comparisons convert best — 79% of the ones models opened were actually cited.
| Page type | Cited | Read but not cited | Conversion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 37 | 19 | 66% |
| How-to guides | 33 | 12 | 73% |
| Community threads | 14 | 22 | 39% |
| Comparisons | 11 | 3 | 79% |
| pricing | 10 | 9 | 53% |
| Listicles | 9 | 3 | 75% |
| Other | 8 | 10 | 44% |
| Product pages | 7 | 3 | 70% |
Of the budget gyms pages models actually opened, how much more often each feature's pages ended up in the cited sources. Structured data is worth 23 percentage points; comparison table pages fare 5pp worse. Measured within the read population, so selection can't flatter it.
| Feature | Pages with | Cited % | Pages without | Cited % | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Structured data | 176 | 63% | 84 | 39% | +23pp |
| Named author | 111 | 64% | 149 | 48% | +16pp |
| Hard statistics | 71 | 54% | 189 | 56% | -2pp |
| Updated this year | 80 | 53% | 180 | 56% | -4pp |
| Answer up front | 108 | 53% | 152 | 57% | -4pp |
| Comparison table | 45 | 51% | 215 | 56% | -5pp |
Readiness scores each brand's own pages on the structure models reward — a direct answer up front, tables, hard numbers, named authors, structured data, recency, specifications. JD Gyms is the widest gap: well-built pages that still aren't converting into citations.
| Brand | Readiness | Pages cited | Pages profiled |
|---|---|---|---|
| JD Gyms | 43 | 2% | 105 |
| The Gym Group | 41 | 4% | 136 |
| Everyone Active | 27 | 0% | 6 |
| PureGym | 25 | 5% | 115 |
| Energie Fitness | 25 | 33% | 3 |
| David Lloyd Clubs | 25 | 0% | 7 |
| Village Gym | 23 | 10% | 10 |
| Nuffield Health | 22 | 14% | 14 |
| Anytime Fitness | 22 | 9% | 35 |
| Snap Fitness | 22 | 25% | 4 |
Readiness is the share of eight measurable structural signals present on a brand's profiled pages. It is a build-quality measure, not a ranking of the brand.
Read straight off the pages AI cited: the consumer questions cited content answers most often. Content that fails to settle these is content models have no reason to quote.
Method: 20 unbranded consumer prompts per category, spread across the buying journey, run weekly against ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini. Read→cited uses Claude and ChatGPT only (Gemini does not separate the two). Correlational observations of model behaviour at the time of the run. Data from the run completed Wed, 02 Sep 2026 09:51:11 GMT.