Converged.AI × BrandInsightAI
BrandInsightAI Insights
Automotive · refreshed weekly

How AI wants luxury suvs & 4x4s

Luxury SUVs & 4x4s is decided on attraction: Rolls-Royce indexes 117 there against Infiniti at 80, a 37-point spread. Rolls-Royce holds the strongest overall profile, indexing 114 against the category average: ahead on all three. But the brand assistants name most often is Mercedes-Benz, not the category's market leader: being desired and being named are not the same measurement. Across these 26 brands, attraction tracks being named most closely (rank correlation 0.43).

26 brands · 60 AI answers · 416 dimension scores · measured, never estimated

Attraction Standing out in the answer: named first, described as superior, magnetic and influential.
Affinity Belonging in the answer: tied to identity, values and legitimacy, not just specifications.
Attachment Staying in the answer: recommended again, dependable, easy, part of the routine.
AttractionAffinityAttachment Each whorl lights one ring per index threshold cleared (90 / 96 / 102 / 108 / 115)

100 = the average brand in the same category.100 = the average brand across every category in the index.

Automotive

Luxury SUVs & 4x4supset

#Brand AttractionAffinityAttachment SummaryNamed in
1 Rolls-Royce: Attraction 117, Affinity 116, Attachment 108Rolls-Royce: Attraction 120, Affinity 113, Attachment 100Rolls-Royce 117120 116113 108100 Ahead on all threeNoticed, not returned to 7%
2 Bentley: Attraction 110, Affinity 109, Attachment 103Bentley: Attraction 113, Affinity 106, Attachment 96Bentley 110113 109106 10396 Noticed, not returned toNoticed, not returned to 13%
3 Lexus: Attraction 100, Affinity 114, Attachment 112Lexus: Attraction 103, Affinity 112, Attachment 104Lexus 100103 114112 112104 Credible, not first choiceCredible, not first choice 5%
4 Land Rover: Attraction 111, Affinity 96, Attachment 102Land Rover: Attraction 115, Affinity 94, Attachment 95Land Rover 111115 9694 10295 Noticed, not returned toNoticed, not returned to 23%
5 Porsche: Attraction 109, Affinity 104, Attachment 100Porsche: Attraction 112, Affinity 102, Attachment 93Porsche 109112 104102 10093 Noticed, not returned toNoticed, not returned to 25%
6 BMW: Attraction 107, Affinity 103, Attachment 108BMW: Attraction 110, Affinity 101, Attachment 100BMW 107110 103101 108100 Chosen, not lovedNoticed, not returned to 35%
7 Audi: Attraction 106, Affinity 103, Attachment 108Audi: Attraction 109, Affinity 101, Attachment 100Audi 106109 103101 108100 Chosen, not lovedNoticed, not returned to 23%
8 Genesis: Attraction 100, Affinity 104, Attachment 109Genesis: Attraction 103, Affinity 102, Attachment 102Genesis 100103 104102 109102 Relied on, not excitingAverage on all three 0%
9 Tesla: Attraction 104, Affinity 104, Attachment 97Tesla: Attraction 107, Affinity 102, Attachment 91Tesla 104107 104102 9791 Noticed, not returned toNoticed, not returned to 2%
10 Aston Martin: Attraction 109, Affinity 97, Attachment 91Aston Martin: Attraction 112, Affinity 95, Attachment 85Aston Martin 109112 9795 9185 Noticed, not returned toNoticed, not returned to 10%
11 Volvo: Attraction 96, Affinity 110, Attachment 102Volvo: Attraction 99, Affinity 108, Attachment 95Volvo 9699 110108 10295 Credible, not first choiceCredible, not first choice 13%
12 Jeep: Attraction 103, Affinity 97, Attachment 102Jeep: Attraction 106, Affinity 95, Attachment 95Jeep 103106 9795 10295 Average on all threeNoticed, not returned to 2%
13 Toyota: Attraction 93, Affinity 107, Attachment 114Toyota: Attraction 96, Affinity 105, Attachment 106Toyota 9396 107105 114106 Relied on, not excitingRelied on, not exciting 12%
14 Mazda: Attraction 98, Affinity 104, Attachment 103Mazda: Attraction 100, Affinity 102, Attachment 96Mazda 98100 104102 10396 Credible, not first choiceLiked, not chosen 0%
15 Mercedes-Benz: Attraction 100, Affinity 97, Attachment 102Mercedes-Benz: Attraction 103, Affinity 95, Attachment 95Mercedes-Benz 100103 9795 10295 Average on all threeNoticed, not returned to 37%
16 Hyundai: Attraction 96, Affinity 103, Attachment 108Hyundai: Attraction 99, Affinity 101, Attachment 100Hyundai 9699 103101 108100 Relied on, not excitingAverage on all three 5%
17 Jaguar: Attraction 100, Affinity 96, Attachment 96Jaguar: Attraction 103, Affinity 94, Attachment 89Jaguar 100103 9694 9689 Noticed, not returned toNoticed, not returned to 2%
18 Ineos: Attraction 102, Affinity 100, Attachment 86Ineos: Attraction 105, Affinity 98, Attachment 80Ineos 102105 10098 8680 Noticed, not returned toNoticed, not returned to 5%
19 Nissan: Attraction 93, Affinity 93, Attachment 103Nissan: Attraction 96, Affinity 91, Attachment 96Nissan 9396 9391 10396 Relied on, not excitingBehind on all three 0%
20 Volkswagen: Attraction 93, Affinity 97, Attachment 103Volkswagen: Attraction 96, Affinity 95, Attachment 96Volkswagen 9396 9795 10396 Relied on, not excitingBehind on all three 8%
21 Maserati: Attraction 102, Affinity 89, Attachment 86Maserati: Attraction 105, Affinity 87, Attachment 80Maserati 102105 8987 8680 Noticed, not returned toNoticed, not returned to 2%
22 Cadillac: Attraction 96, Affinity 92, Attachment 94Cadillac: Attraction 99, Affinity 90, Attachment 88Cadillac 9699 9290 9488 Behind on all threeNoticed, not returned to 3%
23 Lincoln: Attraction 91, Affinity 93, Attachment 96Lincoln: Attraction 93, Affinity 91, Attachment 89Lincoln 9193 9391 9689 Behind on all threeBehind on all three 2%
24 Kia: Attraction 88, Affinity 97, Attachment 100Kia: Attraction 91, Affinity 95, Attachment 93Kia 8891 9795 10093 Relied on, not excitingBehind on all three 7%
25 Alfa Romeo: Attraction 96, Affinity 82, Attachment 81Alfa Romeo: Attraction 99, Affinity 80, Attachment 76Alfa Romeo 9699 8280 8176 Behind on all threeNoticed, not returned to 3%
26 Infiniti: Attraction 80, Affinity 89, Attachment 87Infiniti: Attraction 82, Affinity 87, Attachment 81Infiniti 8082 8987 8781 Behind on all threeBehind on all three 0%

Indexed against the average of the 26 indexed luxury suvs & 4x4s brands, so 100 is the category average and a brand is read against the rivals it actually competes with.Indexed against the average of every indexed brand in the whole index — 1,605 brands across 61 categories — so 100 is the average brand anywhere here and a number reads the same on every board. 26 luxury suvs & 4x4s brands, measured across 60 AI answers in the latest weekly run.

Driver by driver

Where the category actually separates. A wide spread means assistants describe these brands very differently on that driver; a narrow one means it is table stakes.

Attraction

37-point spread · tracks being named 0.43
Rolls-Royce117
Infiniti80

The widest field of the three: this is where the category separates.

Affinity

34-point spread · tracks being named 0.34
Rolls-Royce116
Alfa Romeo82

Real separation, but not the category’s defining contest.

Attachment

33-point spread · tracks being named 0.24
Toyota114
Alfa Romeo81

The tightest of the three: most brands land close together here.

Where each brand stands

Each brand's three indices, summed up in a line: which drivers it is ahead on, which it is behind on, and the one to build next. A brand that is noticed but not returned to has a different problem from one that is relied on but not exciting.

Rolls-Royce: Attraction 117, Affinity 116, Attachment 108
Ahead on all three
Above average on attraction, affinity and attachment.
Rolls-Royce
No driver is behind; protect the lead.
Bentley: Attraction 110, Affinity 109, Attachment 103
Noticed, not returned to
Attraction is its strongest driver; attachment trails behind it.
Bentley · Land Rover · Porsche · Tesla · Aston Martin · Jaguar · Ineos · Maserati
Build next: attachment
Genesis: Attraction 100, Affinity 104, Attachment 109
Relied on, not exciting
Attachment is its strongest driver; attraction trails behind it.
Genesis · Toyota · Hyundai · Nissan · Volkswagen · Kia
Build next: attraction
Lexus: Attraction 100, Affinity 114, Attachment 112
Credible, not first choice
Affinity (identity, values, legitimacy) is its strongest driver.
Lexus · Volvo · Mazda
Build next: attraction
Jeep: Attraction 103, Affinity 97, Attachment 102
Average on all three
Close to average on every driver.
Jeep · Mercedes-Benz
Build next: attraction
BMW: Attraction 107, Affinity 103, Attachment 108
Chosen, not loved
Attraction and attachment are ahead; affinity trails behind them.
BMW · Audi
Build next: affinity
Cadillac: Attraction 96, Affinity 92, Attachment 94
Behind on all three
Below average on attraction, affinity and attachment.
Cadillac · Lincoln · Alfa Romeo · Infiniti
Build next: attraction
Rolls-Royce: Attraction 120, Affinity 113, Attachment 100
Noticed, not returned to
Attraction is its strongest driver; attachment trails behind it.
Rolls-Royce · Bentley · Land Rover · Porsche · BMW · Audi · Tesla · Aston Martin · Jeep · Mercedes-Benz · Jaguar · Ineos · Maserati · Cadillac · Alfa Romeo
Build next: attachment
Toyota: Attraction 96, Affinity 105, Attachment 106
Relied on, not exciting
Attachment is its strongest driver; attraction trails behind it.
Toyota
Build next: attraction
Lexus: Attraction 103, Affinity 112, Attachment 104
Credible, not first choice
Affinity (identity, values, legitimacy) is its strongest driver.
Lexus · Volvo
Build next: attraction
Mazda: Attraction 100, Affinity 102, Attachment 96
Liked, not chosen
Affinity is its strongest driver; attachment is below average.
Mazda
Build next: attachment
Genesis: Attraction 103, Affinity 102, Attachment 102
Average on all three
Close to average on every driver.
Genesis · Hyundai
Build next: attraction
Nissan: Attraction 96, Affinity 91, Attachment 96
Behind on all three
Below average on attraction, affinity and attachment.
Nissan · Volkswagen · Lincoln · Kia · Infiniti
Build next: attraction

What assistants actually talk about

The sixteen dimensions underneath the drivers, scored 0–10 on how the answers describe each brand. Spread is the distance between the strongest and weakest brand: the widest are where a brand can still separate itself, the narrowest are the price of entry.

Where brands separate

DimensionDriverCategory avgStrongestSpread
Value & Pricing Attraction 5.8 Nissan 8.0 6.0
Heritage & Authority Attraction 7.8 Rolls-Royce 10.0 5.0
Sustainability & Ethics Affinity 6.0 Tesla 9.0 4.7
Differentiation vs Sameness Attraction 7.6 Rolls-Royce 10.0 4.5
Lifestyle Fit & Identity Affinity 7.5 Rolls-Royce 10.0 4.5

Where everyone reads alike

DimensionDriverCategory avgStrongestSpread
Delivery & Fulfilment Attachment 6.3 Toyota 7.5 2.0
Ease of Use & Onboarding Attachment 7.0 Rolls-Royce 8.3 2.6
Innovation & Technology Attraction 7.5 Tesla 9.0 3.0
Reliability & Consistency Affinity 7.2 Lexus 9.0 3.7
Trust & Credibility Affinity 7.6 Rolls-Royce 9.7 3.7

Does desire track being recommended?

Rank correlation between a brand's driver index and the share of answers naming it, across the 26 indexed brands in this category. A relationship inside one run's answers — descriptive, never causal, and easily moved by a single brand at this sample size.

Attraction0.43
Affinity0.34
Attachment0.24

Method & limitations

Every week, each category runs a fixed set of unbranded consumer prompts against ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini. A separate model reads the answers and scores every brand named in them across 16 perception dimensions, 0–10. Those dimensions are grouped into the three Drivers of Desire from the Havas Science of Desire framework, and each brand's driver score is indexed against the average brand in its own category — 100 is the category average, 115 is fifteen per cent above it. The Vs all categories switch re-indexes the same scores against the average of every indexed brand across every category, so boards can be read against each other; the ranking inside a category is the same either way. Each category's own average, indexed against the whole index, is its place in the category table. The summary beside each brand describes where it stands on the three drivers against whichever benchmark is showing: above 104 counts as ahead, below 96 as behind.

This measures how AI assistants describe brands in their answers. It is not a survey of people, and it is not an endorsement: the scores are a reading of machine-generated text at the time of the run, and relationships between drivers and how often a brand is named are correlational. A brand needs at least six scored dimensions in a run to be indexed, and a category needs at least four such brands to get a board. See the full methodology.