Converged.AI × BrandInsightAI
BrandInsightAI Insights
Professional · refreshed weekly

How AI wants conveyancing, wills & probate

Citizens Advice is the most desired conveyancing, wills & probate brand the answers name: Desire 83% of maximum, above indifference. 2% of the 47 brands rated sit above indifference; the rest leave the models indifferent. The category is most divided on trust & legitimacy.

47 brands rated · 18 named in the answers · 60 AI answers behind presence · rated by ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini

Attraction Standing out: seen as superior, magnetic and influential.
Affinity Belonging: tied to identity, values and legitimacy, not just specifications.
Attachment Being returned to: an emotional bond, a dependable experience, part of the routine.
AttractionAffinityAttachment Each whorl lights one ring per index threshold cleared (84 / 92 / 100 / 108 / 116)

Indices: 100 = the average brand in the same category.Indices: 100 = the average brand across every category in the index. Desire % and status are absolute and read the same either way.

Conveyancing, Wills & Probate

Every brand, named first

2% above indifference · 98% indifferent · 0% below · 47 brands

#Brand Desire indexDesire %Status AttractionAffinityAttachment SummaryNamed in
1 Citizens Advice: Attraction 149, Affinity 135, Attachment 160Citizens Advice: Attraction 133, Affinity 137, Attachment 143Citizens Advice 147138 83% Above indifference 149133 135137 160143 Ahead on all threeAhead on all three 5%
2 Farewill: Attraction 120, Affinity 111, Attachment 126Farewill: Attraction 107, Affinity 113, Attachment 112Farewill 118111 66% Indifferent 120107 111113 126112 Ahead on all threeCredible, not first choice 3%
3 Octopus Legacy: Attraction 122, Affinity 113, Attachment 120Octopus Legacy: Attraction 109, Affinity 115, Attachment 106Octopus Legacy 118110 66% Indifferent 122109 113115 120106 Ahead on all threeCredible, not first choice 2%
4 Which? Wills: Attraction 116, Affinity 117, Attachment 113Which? Wills: Attraction 103, Affinity 119, Attachment 100Which? Wills 115108 65% Indifferent 116103 117119 113100 Ahead on all threeCredible, not first choice 5%
5 Co-op Legal Services: Attraction 105, Affinity 106, Attachment 109Co-op Legal Services: Attraction 94, Affinity 108, Attachment 97Co-op Legal Services 107100 60% Indifferent 10594 106108 10997 Average on all threeAverage on all three 7%
6 Guardian Angel: Attraction 101, Affinity 99, Attachment 109Guardian Angel: Attraction 90, Affinity 100, Attachment 96Guardian Angel 10296 57% Indifferent 10190 99100 10996 Average on all threeCredible, not first choice 3%
7 UK Probate: Attraction 99, Affinity 105, Attachment 98UK Probate: Attraction 88, Affinity 106, Attachment 87UK Probate 10194 57% Indifferent 9988 105106 9887 Average on all threeLiked, not chosen 7%
8 Muve: Attraction 105, Affinity 94, Attachment 103Muve: Attraction 94, Affinity 95, Attachment 92Muve 10094 56% Indifferent 10594 9495 10392 Average on all threeAverage on all three 5%
9 JMW Solicitors: Attraction 104, Affinity 100, Attachment 93JMW Solicitors: Attraction 93, Affinity 102, Attachment 83JMW Solicitors 9993 56% Indifferent 10493 100102 9383 Average on all threeLiked, not chosen 3%
10 PSR Solicitors: Attraction 94, Affinity 99, Attachment 93PSR Solicitors: Attraction 84, Affinity 101, Attachment 83PSR Solicitors 9690 54% Indifferent 9484 99101 9383 Average on all threeLiked, not chosen 3%
11 Beyond: Attraction 99, Affinity 89, Attachment 99Beyond: Attraction 88, Affinity 91, Attachment 88Beyond 9589 53% Indifferent 9988 8991 9988 Noticed, not returned toLiked, not chosen 7%
12 Express Conveyancing: Attraction 91, Affinity 94, Attachment 97Express Conveyancing: Attraction 82, Affinity 96, Attachment 86Express Conveyancing 9488 53% Indifferent 9182 9496 9786 Average on all threeLiked, not chosen 2%
13 Homeward Legal: Attraction 96, Affinity 87, Attachment 98Homeward Legal: Attraction 86, Affinity 88, Attachment 87Homeward Legal 9387 52% Indifferent 9686 8788 9887 Relied on, not excitingBehind on all three 2%
14 Lacey's: Attraction 91, Affinity 90, Attachment 84Lacey's: Attraction 81, Affinity 92, Attachment 75Lacey's 8983 50% Indifferent 9181 9092 8475 Noticed, not returned toLiked, not chosen 2%
15 GD Property Solicitors: Attraction 86, Affinity 89, Attachment 86GD Property Solicitors: Attraction 77, Affinity 91, Attachment 76GD Property Solicitors 8782 49% Indifferent 8677 8991 8676 Behind on all threeLiked, not chosen 2%
16 Premier Solicitors: Attraction 81, Affinity 84, Attachment 78Premier Solicitors: Attraction 72, Affinity 85, Attachment 69Premier Solicitors 8176 45% Indifferent 8172 8485 7869 Behind on all threeBehind on all three 2%
17 Eden Conveyancing: Attraction 77, Affinity 81, Attachment 77Eden Conveyancing: Attraction 69, Affinity 82, Attachment 69Eden Conveyancing 7873 44% Indifferent 7769 8182 7769 Behind on all threeBehind on all three 2%
18 Clifford Johnston Co: Attraction 75, Affinity 82, Attachment 72Clifford Johnston Co: Attraction 67, Affinity 83, Attachment 64Clifford Johnston & Co 7671 43% Indifferent 7567 8283 7264 Behind on all threeBehind on all three 2%
Rated but never named (29)

The models rated these brands when asked, but none of the category's answers named them.

#Brand Desire indexDesire %Status AttractionAffinityAttachment SummaryNamed in
— amicable: Attraction 120, Affinity 111, Attachment 127amicable: Attraction 107, Affinity 113, Attachment 113amicable 119111 67% Indifferent 120107 111113 127113 Ahead on all threeCredible, not first choice 0%
— Irwin Mitchell: Attraction 115, Affinity 114, Attachment 123Irwin Mitchell: Attraction 103, Affinity 116, Attachment 109Irwin Mitchell 117109 66% Indifferent 115103 114116 123109 Ahead on all threeCredible, not first choice 0%
— Blake Morgan: Attraction 118, Affinity 111, Attachment 117Blake Morgan: Attraction 106, Affinity 113, Attachment 104Blake Morgan 115108 65% Indifferent 118106 111113 117104 Ahead on all threeCredible, not first choice 0%
— Farrer Co: Attraction 113, Affinity 115, Attachment 110Farrer Co: Attraction 101, Affinity 117, Attachment 98Farrer & Co 113105 63% Indifferent 113101 115117 11098 Ahead on all threeCredible, not first choice 0%
— Mills Reeve: Attraction 110, Affinity 113, Attachment 109Mills Reeve: Attraction 98, Affinity 114, Attachment 97Mills & Reeve 111103 62% Indifferent 11098 113114 10997 Credible, not first choiceCredible, not first choice 0%
— Latitude Law: Attraction 110, Affinity 111, Attachment 106Latitude Law: Attraction 98, Affinity 113, Attachment 94Latitude Law 109102 61% Indifferent 11098 111113 10694 Credible, not first choiceCredible, not first choice 0%
— Hugh James: Attraction 109, Affinity 107, Attachment 105Hugh James: Attraction 97, Affinity 109, Attachment 93Hugh James 107100 60% Indifferent 10997 107109 10593 Average on all threeAverage on all three 0%
— Gowling WLG: Attraction 107, Affinity 109, Attachment 100Gowling WLG: Attraction 96, Affinity 111, Attachment 89Gowling WLG 10699 59% Indifferent 10796 109111 10089 Average on all threeCredible, not first choice 0%
— TLT: Attraction 105, Affinity 110, Attachment 100TLT: Attraction 94, Affinity 112, Attachment 89TLT 10598 59% Indifferent 10594 110112 10089 Credible, not first choiceCredible, not first choice 0%
— Boyes Turner: Attraction 105, Affinity 109, Attachment 101Boyes Turner: Attraction 94, Affinity 111, Attachment 90Boyes Turner 10598 59% Indifferent 10594 109111 10190 Average on all threeCredible, not first choice 0%
— Wren Sterling: Attraction 101, Affinity 104, Attachment 107Wren Sterling: Attraction 90, Affinity 106, Attachment 95Wren Sterling 10497 58% Indifferent 10190 104106 10795 Average on all threeCredible, not first choice 0%
— Taylor Rose MW: Attraction 105, Affinity 102, Attachment 106Taylor Rose MW: Attraction 94, Affinity 104, Attachment 94Taylor Rose MW 10497 58% Indifferent 10594 102104 10694 Average on all threeAverage on all three 0%
— Shoosmiths: Attraction 98, Affinity 107, Attachment 101Shoosmiths: Attraction 88, Affinity 108, Attachment 90Shoosmiths 10295 57% Indifferent 9888 107108 10190 Average on all threeLiked, not chosen 0%
— Michelmores: Attraction 102, Affinity 104, Attachment 100Michelmores: Attraction 91, Affinity 105, Attachment 89Michelmores 10295 57% Indifferent 10291 104105 10089 Average on all threeLiked, not chosen 0%
— Levi Solicitors: Attraction 103, Affinity 102, Attachment 100Levi Solicitors: Attraction 92, Affinity 104, Attachment 89Levi Solicitors 10295 57% Indifferent 10392 102104 10089 Average on all threeLiked, not chosen 0%
— Clarke Willmott: Attraction 99, Affinity 104, Attachment 101Clarke Willmott: Attraction 88, Affinity 106, Attachment 89Clarke Willmott 10195 57% Indifferent 9988 104106 10189 Average on all threeLiked, not chosen 0%
— Weightmans: Attraction 99, Affinity 102, Attachment 96Weightmans: Attraction 89, Affinity 103, Attachment 86Weightmans 9993 56% Indifferent 9989 102103 9686 Average on all threeLiked, not chosen 0%
— Convey Law: Attraction 99, Affinity 93, Attachment 103Convey Law: Attraction 88, Affinity 94, Attachment 92Convey Law 9892 55% Indifferent 9988 9394 10392 Average on all threeCredible, not first choice 0%
— Shakespeare Martineau: Attraction 97, Affinity 105, Attachment 92Shakespeare Martineau: Attraction 87, Affinity 106, Attachment 82Shakespeare Martineau 9892 55% Indifferent 9787 105106 9282 Average on all threeLiked, not chosen 0%
— QualitySolicitors: Attraction 99, Affinity 96, Attachment 97QualitySolicitors: Attraction 88, Affinity 98, Attachment 86QualitySolicitors 9791 55% Indifferent 9988 9698 9786 Average on all threeLiked, not chosen 0%
— Gordons LLP: Attraction 91, Affinity 100, Attachment 95Gordons LLP: Attraction 82, Affinity 101, Attachment 84Gordons LLP 9689 54% Indifferent 9182 100101 9584 Average on all threeLiked, not chosen 0%
— Slater and Gordon: Attraction 94, Affinity 93, Attachment 98Slater and Gordon: Attraction 84, Affinity 94, Attachment 87Slater and Gordon 9589 53% Indifferent 9484 9394 9887 Average on all threeLiked, not chosen 0%
— Simpson Millar: Attraction 94, Affinity 95, Attachment 96Simpson Millar: Attraction 84, Affinity 96, Attachment 85Simpson Millar 9589 53% Indifferent 9484 9596 9685 Average on all threeLiked, not chosen 0%
— ONP Solicitors: Attraction 92, Affinity 89, Attachment 92ONP Solicitors: Attraction 83, Affinity 91, Attachment 82ONP Solicitors 9185 51% Indifferent 9283 8991 9282 Noticed, not returned toLiked, not chosen 0%
— ClearLegacy: Attraction 86, Affinity 88, Attachment 95ClearLegacy: Attraction 77, Affinity 89, Attachment 85ClearLegacy 8984 50% Indifferent 8677 8889 9585 Relied on, not excitingBehind on all three 0%
— Kings Court Trust: Attraction 89, Affinity 86, Attachment 90Kings Court Trust: Attraction 80, Affinity 87, Attachment 80Kings Court Trust 8882 49% Indifferent 8980 8687 9080 Behind on all threeBehind on all three 0%
— Rowe Bristol: Attraction 78, Affinity 82, Attachment 73Rowe Bristol: Attraction 70, Affinity 83, Attachment 65Rowe Bristol 7873 44% Indifferent 7870 8283 7365 Behind on all threeBehind on all three 0%
— Beechwood Solicitors: Attraction 78, Affinity 82, Attachment 71Beechwood Solicitors: Attraction 70, Affinity 83, Attachment 64Beechwood Solicitors 7772 43% Indifferent 7870 8283 7164 Behind on all threeBehind on all three 0%
— Lewis Mitchell Solicitors: Attraction 75, Affinity 82, Attachment 72Lewis Mitchell Solicitors: Attraction 67, Affinity 83, Attachment 64Lewis Mitchell Solicitors 7671 43% Indifferent 7567 8283 7264 Behind on all threeBehind on all three 0%

Indexed against the average of the 47 indexed conveyancing, wills & probate brands, so 100 is the category average and a brand is read against the rivals it actually competes with.Indexed against the average of every indexed brand in the whole index — 2,582 brands across 67 categories — so 100 is the average brand anywhere here and a number reads the same on every board. 47 conveyancing, wills & probate brands rated by the assistants in the latest weekly run; Named in is the share of 60 AI answers that name each brand.

Feature profile

What this category is rated on

The brands are most divided on trust & legitimacy: Citizens Advice is rated 6.6 and Lewis Mitchell Solicitors 3.9 on the 1–7 scale, a spread of 100 against the feature's usual spread (100 = as contested as usual). Against every category, conveyancing, wills & probate is rated highest on values & integrity (107) and lowest on emotional magnetism (77).

FeatureDriverCategory meanVs all categories
Perceived superiority Attraction 4.2/7 94
Emotional magnetism Attraction 2.8/7 77
Positive influence Attraction 4.3/7 95
Identity & belonging Affinity 3.8/7 99
Values & integrity Affinity 4.4/7 107
Trust & legitimacy contested Affinity 5.0/7 99
Emotional bond Attachment 3.9/7 94
Reinforced experience Attachment 3.6/7 92
Part of my routine Attachment 3.4/7 81

A feature's category mean is the average of its brands' ratings, 1–7. Vs all categories indexes it against every indexed brand across every category (100 = the average brand anywhere). The contested feature is the one the category's brands are most spread on, measured against how spread that feature usually is.

Stated vs revealed

Rated well is not the same as named

Across the 47 brands, how highly the models rate a brand when asked and how often their answers name it barely go together (rank correlation 0.01).

Rated well, rarely named

  • Citizens Advice83% Desire · named in 5%
  • amicable67% Desire · named in 0%
  • Farewill66% Desire · named in 3%
  • Octopus Legacy66% Desire · named in 2%
  • Irwin Mitchell66% Desire · named in 0%

Showing 5 of 21.

Named, not desired

  • Beyondnamed in 7% · 53% Desire
  • Co-op Legal Servicesnamed in 7% · 60% Desire
  • UK Probatenamed in 7% · 57% Desire
  • Muvenamed in 5% · 56% Desire
  • Which? Willsnamed in 5% · 65% Desire

Showing 5 of 17.

Rated well, rarely named: Desire above the category median, named in 5% of answers or fewer. Named, not desired: among the most-named quarter of the category, yet indifferent or below. A relationship inside one week's run, never a cause.

Model agreement

Where the models disagree

The models broadly agree on these brands (mean correlation 0.83 across 3 pairs: ChatGPT–Claude 0.82 · ChatGPT–Gemini 0.86 · Claude–Gemini 0.82). Still, 217 of 1,457 brand-statement ratings (15%) split by 2 points or more on the 1–7 scale, and the typical brand's Desire differs by 12 points between its most and least generous model.

BrandStatementRated highestRated lowest
amicableDigital experience Claude 7 ChatGPT 4
amicableEnergised Gemini 4 ChatGPT 1
amicableGood feeling Gemini 6 ChatGPT 3
amicableHappiness Gemini 5 ChatGPT 2
Citizens AdvicePurchase experience Gemini 6 Claude 3

The widest 5 of 217 splits.

Across the whole index, on the same brands: Gemini rates +4.5 points of Desire % against its peers; ChatGPT rates −1.7 points of Desire % against its peers; Claude rates −3.0 points of Desire % against its peers. A generous model lifts every brand it rates, which is why scores are combined across models and indexed within the category.

Distinctive statements

What sets the leading brands apart

For the category's leading named brands, the glossary statements each is rated furthest above and below the category's average, in points on the 1–7 scale.

Citizens Advice
Above the categoryWould miss it +3.6, Good value +2.5, Advocacy +2.4
Below the categoryExclusive experience −0.4
Farewill
Above the categoryDigital experience +2.3, Innovative +2.1, Simplify +2.1
Below the categoryHealthy −0.6, Exclusive experience −0.4, Happiness −0.1
Octopus Legacy
Above the categoryNew ideas +1.9, Innovative +1.8, Sustainability +1.6
Below the categoryGood reputation −0.2
Which? Wills
Above the categoryTrust +1.4, Integrity +1.1, Good reputation +1.1
Below the categoryExclusive experience −0.7, Healthy −0.6, Connecting −0.5
Co-op Legal Services
Above the categorySustainability +1.0, Would miss it +0.9, Good value +0.5
Below the categoryNew ideas −0.6, Energised −0.4, Exclusive experience −0.4

Method & limitations

Every week, ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini are each asked directly, the way a survey asks a respondent, to rate every brand in the category on the 31 statements of the Havas Science of Desire glossary, on the survey's own 1–7 agreement scale. Statements roll up to nine features and the three Drivers of Desire (a feature is the mean of its statements; a driver is the sum of its three features, out of 21; Desire is the sum of the drivers, out of 63). Each brand is indexed against the average brand in its own category — 100 is the category average, 115 is fifteen per cent above it — and the Vs all categories switch re-indexes the same scores against every indexed brand in the index. Desire % is Desire as a share of its maximum. A brand is above indifference when its Desire is above two-thirds of its maximum (42 of 63), below indifference at or under one-third (21), and indifferent in between. The summary beside each brand says where it stands on the three drivers: an index of 110 or more counts as ahead, 90 or less as behind.

These are the assistants' own ratings when asked. They are not a survey of people and not an endorsement, and they are not read from what the assistants happen to say in an answer: the answers to the category's unbranded consumer prompts are used only to count how often each brand is named, and as supporting evidence. Relationships between ratings and how often a brand is named are correlational. A brand is indexed only when all 31 statements have been rated in a run by at least two models, and a category needs at least 4 such brands to get a board. See the full methodology.