How AI wants conveyancing, wills & probate
Citizens Advice is the most desired conveyancing, wills & probate brand the answers name: Desire 83% of maximum, above indifference. 2% of the 47 brands rated sit above indifference; the rest leave the models indifferent. The category is most divided on trust & legitimacy.
47 brands rated · 18 named in the answers · 60 AI answers behind presence · rated by ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini
Indices: 100 = the average brand in the same category.Indices: 100 = the average brand across every category in the index. Desire % and status are absolute and read the same either way.
Every brand, named first
2% above indifference · 98% indifferent · 0% below · 47 brands
| # | Brand | Desire index | Desire % | Status | Attraction | Affinity | Attachment | Summary | Named in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citizens Advice | 147138 | 83% | Above indifference | 149133 | 135137 | 160143 | Ahead on all threeAhead on all three | 5% |
| 2 | Farewill | 118111 | 66% | Indifferent | 120107 | 111113 | 126112 | Ahead on all threeCredible, not first choice | 3% |
| 3 | Octopus Legacy | 118110 | 66% | Indifferent | 122109 | 113115 | 120106 | Ahead on all threeCredible, not first choice | 2% |
| 4 | Which? Wills | 115108 | 65% | Indifferent | 116103 | 117119 | 113100 | Ahead on all threeCredible, not first choice | 5% |
| 5 | Co-op Legal Services | 107100 | 60% | Indifferent | 10594 | 106108 | 10997 | Average on all threeAverage on all three | 7% |
| 6 | Guardian Angel | 10296 | 57% | Indifferent | 10190 | 99100 | 10996 | Average on all threeCredible, not first choice | 3% |
| 7 | UK Probate | 10194 | 57% | Indifferent | 9988 | 105106 | 9887 | Average on all threeLiked, not chosen | 7% |
| 8 | Muve | 10094 | 56% | Indifferent | 10594 | 9495 | 10392 | Average on all threeAverage on all three | 5% |
| 9 | JMW Solicitors | 9993 | 56% | Indifferent | 10493 | 100102 | 9383 | Average on all threeLiked, not chosen | 3% |
| 10 | PSR Solicitors | 9690 | 54% | Indifferent | 9484 | 99101 | 9383 | Average on all threeLiked, not chosen | 3% |
| 11 | Beyond | 9589 | 53% | Indifferent | 9988 | 8991 | 9988 | Noticed, not returned toLiked, not chosen | 7% |
| 12 | Express Conveyancing | 9488 | 53% | Indifferent | 9182 | 9496 | 9786 | Average on all threeLiked, not chosen | 2% |
| 13 | Homeward Legal | 9387 | 52% | Indifferent | 9686 | 8788 | 9887 | Relied on, not excitingBehind on all three | 2% |
| 14 | Lacey's | 8983 | 50% | Indifferent | 9181 | 9092 | 8475 | Noticed, not returned toLiked, not chosen | 2% |
| 15 | GD Property Solicitors | 8782 | 49% | Indifferent | 8677 | 8991 | 8676 | Behind on all threeLiked, not chosen | 2% |
| 16 | Premier Solicitors | 8176 | 45% | Indifferent | 8172 | 8485 | 7869 | Behind on all threeBehind on all three | 2% |
| 17 | Eden Conveyancing | 7873 | 44% | Indifferent | 7769 | 8182 | 7769 | Behind on all threeBehind on all three | 2% |
| 18 | Clifford Johnston & Co | 7671 | 43% | Indifferent | 7567 | 8283 | 7264 | Behind on all threeBehind on all three | 2% |
Rated but never named (29)
The models rated these brands when asked, but none of the category's answers named them.
| # | Brand | Desire index | Desire % | Status | Attraction | Affinity | Attachment | Summary | Named in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | amicable | 119111 | 67% | Indifferent | 120107 | 111113 | 127113 | Ahead on all threeCredible, not first choice | 0% |
| — | Irwin Mitchell | 117109 | 66% | Indifferent | 115103 | 114116 | 123109 | Ahead on all threeCredible, not first choice | 0% |
| — | Blake Morgan | 115108 | 65% | Indifferent | 118106 | 111113 | 117104 | Ahead on all threeCredible, not first choice | 0% |
| — | Farrer & Co | 113105 | 63% | Indifferent | 113101 | 115117 | 11098 | Ahead on all threeCredible, not first choice | 0% |
| — | Mills & Reeve | 111103 | 62% | Indifferent | 11098 | 113114 | 10997 | Credible, not first choiceCredible, not first choice | 0% |
| — | Latitude Law | 109102 | 61% | Indifferent | 11098 | 111113 | 10694 | Credible, not first choiceCredible, not first choice | 0% |
| — | Hugh James | 107100 | 60% | Indifferent | 10997 | 107109 | 10593 | Average on all threeAverage on all three | 0% |
| — | Gowling WLG | 10699 | 59% | Indifferent | 10796 | 109111 | 10089 | Average on all threeCredible, not first choice | 0% |
| — | TLT | 10598 | 59% | Indifferent | 10594 | 110112 | 10089 | Credible, not first choiceCredible, not first choice | 0% |
| — | Boyes Turner | 10598 | 59% | Indifferent | 10594 | 109111 | 10190 | Average on all threeCredible, not first choice | 0% |
| — | Wren Sterling | 10497 | 58% | Indifferent | 10190 | 104106 | 10795 | Average on all threeCredible, not first choice | 0% |
| — | Taylor Rose MW | 10497 | 58% | Indifferent | 10594 | 102104 | 10694 | Average on all threeAverage on all three | 0% |
| — | Shoosmiths | 10295 | 57% | Indifferent | 9888 | 107108 | 10190 | Average on all threeLiked, not chosen | 0% |
| — | Michelmores | 10295 | 57% | Indifferent | 10291 | 104105 | 10089 | Average on all threeLiked, not chosen | 0% |
| — | Levi Solicitors | 10295 | 57% | Indifferent | 10392 | 102104 | 10089 | Average on all threeLiked, not chosen | 0% |
| — | Clarke Willmott | 10195 | 57% | Indifferent | 9988 | 104106 | 10189 | Average on all threeLiked, not chosen | 0% |
| — | Weightmans | 9993 | 56% | Indifferent | 9989 | 102103 | 9686 | Average on all threeLiked, not chosen | 0% |
| — | Convey Law | 9892 | 55% | Indifferent | 9988 | 9394 | 10392 | Average on all threeCredible, not first choice | 0% |
| — | Shakespeare Martineau | 9892 | 55% | Indifferent | 9787 | 105106 | 9282 | Average on all threeLiked, not chosen | 0% |
| — | QualitySolicitors | 9791 | 55% | Indifferent | 9988 | 9698 | 9786 | Average on all threeLiked, not chosen | 0% |
| — | Gordons LLP | 9689 | 54% | Indifferent | 9182 | 100101 | 9584 | Average on all threeLiked, not chosen | 0% |
| — | Slater and Gordon | 9589 | 53% | Indifferent | 9484 | 9394 | 9887 | Average on all threeLiked, not chosen | 0% |
| — | Simpson Millar | 9589 | 53% | Indifferent | 9484 | 9596 | 9685 | Average on all threeLiked, not chosen | 0% |
| — | ONP Solicitors | 9185 | 51% | Indifferent | 9283 | 8991 | 9282 | Noticed, not returned toLiked, not chosen | 0% |
| — | ClearLegacy | 8984 | 50% | Indifferent | 8677 | 8889 | 9585 | Relied on, not excitingBehind on all three | 0% |
| — | Kings Court Trust | 8882 | 49% | Indifferent | 8980 | 8687 | 9080 | Behind on all threeBehind on all three | 0% |
| — | Rowe Bristol | 7873 | 44% | Indifferent | 7870 | 8283 | 7365 | Behind on all threeBehind on all three | 0% |
| — | Beechwood Solicitors | 7772 | 43% | Indifferent | 7870 | 8283 | 7164 | Behind on all threeBehind on all three | 0% |
| — | Lewis Mitchell Solicitors | 7671 | 43% | Indifferent | 7567 | 8283 | 7264 | Behind on all threeBehind on all three | 0% |
Indexed against the average of the 47 indexed conveyancing, wills & probate brands, so 100 is the category average and a brand is read against the rivals it actually competes with.Indexed against the average of every indexed brand in the whole index — 2,582 brands across 67 categories — so 100 is the average brand anywhere here and a number reads the same on every board. 47 conveyancing, wills & probate brands rated by the assistants in the latest weekly run; Named in is the share of 60 AI answers that name each brand.
What this category is rated on
The brands are most divided on trust & legitimacy: Citizens Advice is rated 6.6 and Lewis Mitchell Solicitors 3.9 on the 1–7 scale, a spread of 100 against the feature's usual spread (100 = as contested as usual). Against every category, conveyancing, wills & probate is rated highest on values & integrity (107) and lowest on emotional magnetism (77).
| Feature | Driver | Category mean | Vs all categories |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perceived superiority | Attraction | 4.2/7 | 94 |
| Emotional magnetism | Attraction | 2.8/7 | 77 |
| Positive influence | Attraction | 4.3/7 | 95 |
| Identity & belonging | Affinity | 3.8/7 | 99 |
| Values & integrity | Affinity | 4.4/7 | 107 |
| Trust & legitimacy contested | Affinity | 5.0/7 | 99 |
| Emotional bond | Attachment | 3.9/7 | 94 |
| Reinforced experience | Attachment | 3.6/7 | 92 |
| Part of my routine | Attachment | 3.4/7 | 81 |
A feature's category mean is the average of its brands' ratings, 1–7. Vs all categories indexes it against every indexed brand across every category (100 = the average brand anywhere). The contested feature is the one the category's brands are most spread on, measured against how spread that feature usually is.
Rated well is not the same as named
Across the 47 brands, how highly the models rate a brand when asked and how often their answers name it barely go together (rank correlation 0.01).
Rated well, rarely named
- Citizens Advice83% Desire · named in 5%
- amicable67% Desire · named in 0%
- Farewill66% Desire · named in 3%
- Octopus Legacy66% Desire · named in 2%
- Irwin Mitchell66% Desire · named in 0%
Showing 5 of 21.
Named, not desired
- Beyondnamed in 7% · 53% Desire
- Co-op Legal Servicesnamed in 7% · 60% Desire
- UK Probatenamed in 7% · 57% Desire
- Muvenamed in 5% · 56% Desire
- Which? Willsnamed in 5% · 65% Desire
Showing 5 of 17.
Rated well, rarely named: Desire above the category median, named in 5% of answers or fewer. Named, not desired: among the most-named quarter of the category, yet indifferent or below. A relationship inside one week's run, never a cause.
Where the models disagree
The models broadly agree on these brands (mean correlation 0.83 across 3 pairs: ChatGPT–Claude 0.82 · ChatGPT–Gemini 0.86 · Claude–Gemini 0.82). Still, 217 of 1,457 brand-statement ratings (15%) split by 2 points or more on the 1–7 scale, and the typical brand's Desire differs by 12 points between its most and least generous model.
| Brand | Statement | Rated highest | Rated lowest |
|---|---|---|---|
| amicable | Digital experience | Claude 7 | ChatGPT 4 |
| amicable | Energised | Gemini 4 | ChatGPT 1 |
| amicable | Good feeling | Gemini 6 | ChatGPT 3 |
| amicable | Happiness | Gemini 5 | ChatGPT 2 |
| Citizens Advice | Purchase experience | Gemini 6 | Claude 3 |
The widest 5 of 217 splits.
Across the whole index, on the same brands: Gemini rates +4.5 points of Desire % against its peers; ChatGPT rates −1.7 points of Desire % against its peers; Claude rates −3.0 points of Desire % against its peers. A generous model lifts every brand it rates, which is why scores are combined across models and indexed within the category.
What sets the leading brands apart
For the category's leading named brands, the glossary statements each is rated furthest above and below the category's average, in points on the 1–7 scale.
Method & limitations
Every week, ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini are each asked directly, the way a survey asks a respondent, to rate every brand in the category on the 31 statements of the Havas Science of Desire glossary, on the survey's own 1–7 agreement scale. Statements roll up to nine features and the three Drivers of Desire (a feature is the mean of its statements; a driver is the sum of its three features, out of 21; Desire is the sum of the drivers, out of 63). Each brand is indexed against the average brand in its own category — 100 is the category average, 115 is fifteen per cent above it — and the Vs all categories switch re-indexes the same scores against every indexed brand in the index. Desire % is Desire as a share of its maximum. A brand is above indifference when its Desire is above two-thirds of its maximum (42 of 63), below indifference at or under one-third (21), and indifferent in between. The summary beside each brand says where it stands on the three drivers: an index of 110 or more counts as ahead, 90 or less as behind.
These are the assistants' own ratings when asked. They are not a survey of people and not an endorsement, and they are not read from what the assistants happen to say in an answer: the answers to the category's unbranded consumer prompts are used only to count how often each brand is named, and as supporting evidence. Relationships between ratings and how often a brand is named are correlational. A brand is indexed only when all 31 statements have been rated in a run by at least two models, and a category needs at least 4 such brands to get a board. See the full methodology.
Read the category report
Which conveyancing, wills & probate brands the models recommend, the sources they trust and how often a brand page is read but not cited: Conveyancing, Wills & Probate · The Category Report.
Other categories
Where next
This edition measures what AI wants from these brands. These answer what comes next — which brands AI names, which websites feed those answers, and how any of it is counted.