Converged.AI × BrandInsightAI
BrandInsightAI Insights
Food · refreshed weekly

How AI wants food delivery

Food Delivery is decided on attraction: Deliveroo indexes 111 there against Asda at 86, a 25-point spread. Affinity separates almost nobody (7 points across the whole category), so being described that way is table stakes here rather than an advantage. Deliveroo holds the strongest overall profile at 105 — magnetic but unbought. Across these 8 brands, attraction tracks being named most closely (rank correlation 0.49).

8 brands · 60 AI answers · 128 dimension scores · measured, never estimated

Attraction Standing out in the answer: named first, described as superior, magnetic and influential.
Affinity Belonging in the answer: tied to identity, values and legitimacy, not just specifications.
Attachment Staying in the answer: recommended again, dependable, easy, part of the routine.
AttractionAffinityAttachment Each whorl lights one ring per index threshold cleared (90 / 96 / 102 / 108 / 115)
Food

Food Delivery

#Brand AttractionAffinityAttachment Desire shapeNamed in
1 Deliveroo: Attraction 111, Affinity 100, Attachment 103Deliveroo 111 100 103 Magnetic but unbought 78%
2 Ocado: Attraction 109, Affinity 103, Attachment 103Ocado 109 103 103 Magnetic but unbought 13%
3 Tesco: Attraction 103, Affinity 103, Attachment 104Tesco 103 103 104 Habit, not love 17%
4 Uber Eats: Attraction 108, Affinity 97, Attachment 102Uber Eats 108 97 102 Magnetic but unbought 73%
5 Just Eat: Attraction 102, Affinity 101, Attachment 102Just Eat 102 101 102 Category default 68%
6 Sainsbury's: Attraction 94, Affinity 104, Attachment 93Sainsbury's 94 104 93 Loved, not chosen 8%
7 Asda: Attraction 86, Affinity 97, Attachment 96Asda 86 97 96 Loved, not chosen 15%
8 Morrisons: Attraction 88, Affinity 97, Attachment 96Morrisons 88 97 96 Loved, not chosen 15%

Indexed against the food delivery average of 8 brands (100 = the category), measured across 60 AI answers in the latest weekly run.

Driver by driver

Where the category actually separates. A wide spread means assistants describe these brands very differently on that driver; a narrow one means it is table stakes.

Attraction

25-point spread · tracks being named 0.49
Deliveroo111
Asda86

The widest field of the three: this is where the category separates.

Attachment

11-point spread · tracks being named 0.49
Tesco104
Sainsbury's93

Real separation, but not the category’s defining contest.

Affinity

7-point spread · tracks being named -0.46
Sainsbury's104
Morrisons97

The tightest of the three: most brands land close together here.

The shapes AI leaves these brands in

Three indices make a profile, and profiles fall into recognisable shapes. A brand that is magnetic but unbought has a different problem from a habit nobody loves — and a different thing to build next.

Deliveroo: Attraction 111, Affinity 100, Attachment 103
Magnetic but unbought
AI admires it and forgets to recommend buying it again.
Deliveroo · Ocado · Uber Eats
Build next: attachment
Tesco: Attraction 103, Affinity 103, Attachment 104
Habit, not love
Recommended for reliability and ease; nobody calls it exciting.
Tesco
Build next: attraction
Sainsbury's: Attraction 94, Affinity 104, Attachment 93
Loved, not chosen
Identity and values without superiority or habit.
Sainsbury's · Asda · Morrisons
Build next: attachment
Just Eat: Attraction 102, Affinity 101, Attachment 102
Category default
Parity on all three: the safe answer, never the interesting one.
Just Eat
Build next: attraction

What assistants actually talk about

The sixteen dimensions underneath the drivers, scored 0–10 on how the answers describe each brand. Spread is the distance between the strongest and weakest brand: the widest are where a brand can still separate itself, the narrowest are the price of entry.

Where brands separate

DimensionDriverCategory avgStrongestSpread
Boldness & Creativity Attraction 5.8 Deliveroo 7.0 2.0
Heritage & Authority Affinity 7.4 Asda 8.0 2.0
Innovation & Technology Attraction 6.9 Ocado 8.0 2.0
Leadership & Momentum Attraction 7.3 Deliveroo 8.0 2.0
Lifestyle Fit & Identity Affinity 6.1 Deliveroo 7.0 2.0

Where everyone reads alike

DimensionDriverCategory avgStrongestSpread
Sustainability & Ethics Affinity 5.8 Asda 6.0 0.5
Reliability & Consistency Attachment 7.3 Deliveroo 7.7 0.7
Value & Pricing Attachment 6.5 Asda 7.0 1.0
Trust & Credibility Affinity 7.6 Just Eat 8.0 1.0
Customer Service & Support Attachment 6.5 Ocado 7.0 1.0

Does desire track being recommended?

Rank correlation between a brand's driver index and the share of answers naming it, across the 8 indexed brands in this category. A relationship inside one run's answers — descriptive, never causal, and easily moved by a single brand at this sample size.

Attraction0.49
Affinity-0.46
Attachment0.49

Method & limitations

Every week, each category runs a fixed set of unbranded consumer prompts against ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini. A separate model reads the answers and scores every brand named in them across 16 perception dimensions, 0–10. Those dimensions are grouped into the three Drivers of Desire from the Havas Science of Desire framework, and each brand's driver score is indexed against the average of every scored brand in its category — 100 is the category, 115 is fifteen per cent above it.

This measures how AI assistants describe brands in their answers. It is not a survey of people, and it is not an endorsement: the scores are a reading of machine-generated text at the time of the run, and relationships between drivers and how often a brand is named are correlational. A brand needs at least six scored dimensions in a run to be indexed, and a category needs at least four such brands to get a board. See the full methodology.