Converged.AI × BrandInsightAI
BrandInsightAI Insights
Technology · refreshed weekly

How AI wants laptops

Apple is the most desired laptops brand the answers name: Desire 85% of maximum, above indifference. 20% of the 25 brands rated sit above indifference; the rest leave the models indifferent. The category is most divided on emotional magnetism.

25 brands rated · 16 named in the answers · 60 AI answers behind presence · rated by ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini

Attraction Standing out: seen as superior, magnetic and influential.
Affinity Belonging: tied to identity, values and legitimacy, not just specifications.
Attachment Being returned to: an emotional bond, a dependable experience, part of the routine.
AttractionAffinityAttachment Each whorl lights one ring per index threshold cleared (84 / 92 / 100 / 108 / 116)

Indices: 100 = the average brand in the same category.Indices: 100 = the average brand across every category in the index. Desire % and status are absolute and read the same either way.

Laptops

Every brand, named first

20% above indifference · 80% indifferent · 0% below · 25 brands

#Brand Desire indexDesire %Status AttractionAffinityAttachment SummaryNamed in
1 Apple: Attraction 141, Affinity 126, Attachment 147Apple: Attraction 147, Affinity 126, Attachment 150Apple 138141 85% Above indifference 141147 126126 147150 Ahead on all threeAhead on all three 53%
2 Framework: Attraction 117, Affinity 124, Attachment 111Framework: Attraction 122, Affinity 124, Attachment 113Framework 117120 72% Above indifference 117122 124124 111113 Ahead on all threeAhead on all three 2%
3 Samsung: Attraction 113, Affinity 109, Attachment 124Samsung: Attraction 118, Affinity 109, Attachment 127Samsung 115118 71% Above indifference 113118 109109 124127 Chosen, not lovedChosen, not loved 5%
4 Microsoft: Attraction 103, Affinity 109, Attachment 127Microsoft: Attraction 108, Affinity 109, Attachment 130Microsoft 113115 69% Above indifference 103108 109109 127130 Relied on, not excitingRelied on, not exciting 37%
5 Razer: Attraction 120, Affinity 103, Attachment 107Razer: Attraction 125, Affinity 103, Attachment 109Razer 110113 68% Above indifference 120125 103103 107109 Noticed, not returned toNoticed, not returned to 15%
6 Alienware: Attraction 116, Affinity 102, Attachment 106Alienware: Attraction 121, Affinity 102, Attachment 109Alienware 108111 66% Indifferent 116121 102102 106109 Noticed, not returned toNoticed, not returned to 45%
7 LG: Attraction 105, Affinity 108, Attachment 111LG: Attraction 109, Affinity 108, Attachment 113LG 108110 66% Indifferent 105109 108108 111113 Relied on, not excitingRelied on, not exciting 2%
8 ASUS: Attraction 111, Affinity 104, Attachment 107ASUS: Attraction 116, Affinity 104, Attachment 109ASUS 107109 66% Indifferent 111116 104104 107109 Noticed, not returned toNoticed, not returned to 53%
9 Dell: Attraction 97, Affinity 109, Attachment 102Dell: Attraction 101, Affinity 109, Attachment 104Dell 103105 63% Indifferent 97101 109109 102104 Average on all threeAverage on all three 43%
10 HP: Attraction 95, Affinity 104, Attachment 98HP: Attraction 99, Affinity 104, Attachment 101HP 99102 61% Indifferent 9599 104104 98101 Average on all threeAverage on all three 32%
11 MSI: Attraction 104, Affinity 98, Attachment 93MSI: Attraction 109, Affinity 98, Attachment 95MSI 99101 60% Indifferent 104109 9898 9395 Average on all threeAverage on all three 22%
12 Lenovo: Attraction 99, Affinity 103, Attachment 96Lenovo: Attraction 103, Affinity 103, Attachment 98Lenovo 99102 61% Indifferent 99103 103103 9698 Average on all threeAverage on all three 62%
13 Gigabyte: Attraction 94, Affinity 91, Attachment 87Gigabyte: Attraction 98, Affinity 91, Attachment 89Gigabyte 9193 56% Indifferent 9498 9191 8789 Noticed, not returned toNoticed, not returned to 3%
14 Currys: Attraction 82, Affinity 89, Attachment 98Currys: Attraction 86, Affinity 89, Attachment 100Currys 9092 55% Indifferent 8286 8989 98100 Relied on, not excitingRelied on, not exciting 10%
15 Acer: Attraction 83, Affinity 90, Attachment 81Acer: Attraction 86, Affinity 90, Attachment 83Acer 8587 52% Indifferent 8386 9090 8183 Behind on all threeBehind on all three 20%
16 Dynabook: Attraction 77, Affinity 95, Attachment 82Dynabook: Attraction 80, Affinity 95, Attachment 84Dynabook 8586 52% Indifferent 7780 9595 8284 Liked, not chosenLiked, not chosen 2%
Rated but never named (9)

The models rated these brands when asked, but none of the category's answers named them.

#Brand Desire indexDesire %Status AttractionAffinityAttachment SummaryNamed in
— Scan: Attraction 103, Affinity 108, Attachment 103Scan: Attraction 108, Affinity 108, Attachment 105Scan 105107 64% Indifferent 103108 108108 103105 Average on all threeAverage on all three 0%
— Overclockers: Attraction 104, Affinity 103, Attachment 99Overclockers: Attraction 109, Affinity 103, Attachment 102Overclockers 102105 63% Indifferent 104109 103103 99102 Average on all threeAverage on all three 0%
— Xiaomi: Attraction 108, Affinity 91, Attachment 102Xiaomi: Attraction 113, Affinity 91, Attachment 105Xiaomi 101103 62% Indifferent 108113 9191 102105 Average on all threeNoticed, not returned to 0%
— PC Specialist: Attraction 97, Affinity 103, Attachment 98PC Specialist: Attraction 102, Affinity 103, Attachment 100PC Specialist 99102 61% Indifferent 97102 103103 98100 Average on all threeAverage on all three 0%
— XMG: Attraction 100, Affinity 94, Attachment 97XMG: Attraction 104, Affinity 94, Attachment 99XMG 9799 59% Indifferent 100104 9494 9799 Average on all threeAverage on all three 0%
— Honor: Attraction 93, Affinity 95, Attachment 92Honor: Attraction 97, Affinity 95, Attachment 94Honor 9395 57% Indifferent 9397 9595 9294 Average on all threeAverage on all three 0%
— Huawei: Attraction 94, Affinity 80, Attachment 95Huawei: Attraction 98, Affinity 80, Attachment 97Huawei 8991 55% Indifferent 9498 8080 9597 Relied on, not excitingNoticed, not returned to 0%
— VAIO: Attraction 74, Affinity 88, Attachment 72VAIO: Attraction 77, Affinity 88, Attachment 74VAIO 7880 48% Indifferent 7477 8888 7274 Behind on all threeBehind on all three 0%
— Medion: Attraction 68, Affinity 75, Attachment 66Medion: Attraction 71, Affinity 75, Attachment 67Medion 7071 43% Indifferent 6871 7575 6667 Behind on all threeBehind on all three 0%

Indexed against the average of the 25 indexed laptops brands, so 100 is the category average and a brand is read against the rivals it actually competes with.Indexed against the average of every indexed brand in the whole index — 2,582 brands across 67 categories — so 100 is the average brand anywhere here and a number reads the same on every board. 25 laptops brands rated by the assistants in the latest weekly run; Named in is the share of 60 AI answers that name each brand.

Feature profile

What this category is rated on

The brands are most divided on emotional magnetism: Apple is rated 5.7 and Medion 2.7 on the 1–7 scale, a spread of 128 against the feature's usual spread (100 = as contested as usual). Against every category, laptops is rated highest on identity & belonging (107) and lowest on values & integrity (95).

FeatureDriverCategory meanVs all categories
Perceived superiority Attraction 4.7/7 104
Emotional magnetism contested Attraction 3.8/7 104
Positive influence Attraction 4.7/7 104
Identity & belonging Affinity 4.1/7 107
Values & integrity Affinity 3.9/7 95
Trust & legitimacy Affinity 5.0/7 99
Emotional bond Attachment 4.3/7 104
Reinforced experience Attachment 3.9/7 99
Part of my routine Attachment 4.3/7 104

A feature's category mean is the average of its brands' ratings, 1–7. Vs all categories indexes it against every indexed brand across every category (100 = the average brand anywhere). The contested feature is the one the category's brands are most spread on, measured against how spread that feature usually is.

Stated vs revealed

Rated well is not the same as named

Across the 25 brands, how highly the models rate a brand when asked and how often their answers name it go loosely together (rank correlation 0.42).

Rated well, rarely named

  • Framework72% Desire · named in 2%
  • Samsung71% Desire · named in 5%
  • LG66% Desire · named in 2%
  • Scan64% Desire · named in 0%
  • Overclockers63% Desire · named in 0%

Showing 5 of 6.

Named, not desired

  • Lenovonamed in 62% · 61% Desire
  • ASUSnamed in 53% · 66% Desire
  • Alienwarenamed in 45% · 66% Desire
  • Dellnamed in 43% · 63% Desire
  • HPnamed in 32% · 61% Desire

Rated well, rarely named: Desire above the category median, named in 5% of answers or fewer. Named, not desired: among the most-named quarter of the category, yet indifferent or below. A relationship inside one week's run, never a cause.

Model agreement

Where the models disagree

The models broadly agree on these brands (mean correlation 0.75 across 3 pairs: ChatGPT–Claude 0.74 · ChatGPT–Gemini 0.78 · Claude–Gemini 0.74). Still, 89 of 775 brand-statement ratings (11%) split by 2 points or more on the 1–7 scale, and the typical brand's Desire differs by 8 points between its most and least generous model.

BrandStatementRated highestRated lowest
DellConnecting ChatGPT 6 Claude 2
AcerConnecting ChatGPT 5 Claude 2
DynabookLeader Claude 5 Gemini 2
HonorConnecting ChatGPT 5 Claude 2
XiaomiConnecting ChatGPT 6 Claude 3

The widest 5 of 89 splits.

Across the whole index, on the same brands: Gemini rates +4.5 points of Desire % against its peers; ChatGPT rates −1.7 points of Desire % against its peers; Claude rates −3.0 points of Desire % against its peers. A generous model lifts every brand it rates, which is why scores are combined across models and indexed within the category.

Distinctive statements

What sets the leading brands apart

For the category's leading named brands, the glossary statements each is rated furthest above and below the category's average, in points on the 1–7 scale.

Apple
Above the categoryExclusive experience +2.6, Digital experience +2.6, Connecting +2.4
Below the categoryGood value −1.4, Wealth −0.6
Framework
Above the categorySustainability +2.6, Unique +2.4, Transparent +2.0
Below the categoryLeader −1.0, Good value −0.7, Connecting −0.6
Samsung
Above the categoryNew ideas +1.5, Connecting +1.4, Would miss it +1.4
Below the categoryWealth −0.6, Good value −0.4, Integrity −0.1
Microsoft
Above the categoryLeader +2.0, Would miss it +2.0, Connecting +1.8
Below the categoryGood value −0.7, Good feeling −0.3, Quality products −0.2
Razer
Above the categorySelf-expression +2.2, Energised +2.0, Exclusive experience +1.6
Below the categoryWealth −1.6, Good value −1.4, Simplify −0.7
Supporting evidence

What the answers say

The category's answers say enough to judge 41 of the 775 brand-statement ratings (5.3%). Of those, 71% back the rating, 2% lean against it and the rest are mixed. The answers were not written to describe every brand on every statement, so this is a check on the ratings, not a second score. Counts only; no answer text is published.

Method & limitations

Every week, ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini are each asked directly, the way a survey asks a respondent, to rate every brand in the category on the 31 statements of the Havas Science of Desire glossary, on the survey's own 1–7 agreement scale. Statements roll up to nine features and the three Drivers of Desire (a feature is the mean of its statements; a driver is the sum of its three features, out of 21; Desire is the sum of the drivers, out of 63). Each brand is indexed against the average brand in its own category — 100 is the category average, 115 is fifteen per cent above it — and the Vs all categories switch re-indexes the same scores against every indexed brand in the index. Desire % is Desire as a share of its maximum. A brand is above indifference when its Desire is above two-thirds of its maximum (42 of 63), below indifference at or under one-third (21), and indifferent in between. The summary beside each brand says where it stands on the three drivers: an index of 110 or more counts as ahead, 90 or less as behind.

These are the assistants' own ratings when asked. They are not a survey of people and not an endorsement, and they are not read from what the assistants happen to say in an answer: the answers to the category's unbranded consumer prompts are used only to count how often each brand is named, and as supporting evidence. Relationships between ratings and how often a brand is named are correlational. A brand is indexed only when all 31 statements have been rated in a run by at least two models, and a category needs at least 4 such brands to get a board. See the full methodology.