Converged.AI × BrandInsightAI
BrandInsightAI Insights
Sport · refreshed weekly

How AI wants budget gyms

Budget Gyms is decided on attraction: Third Space indexes 117 there against DW Fitness First at 85, a 32-point spread. David Lloyd Clubs holds the strongest overall profile at 108 — quietly trusted. But the brand assistants name most often is The Gym Group, not the category's market leader: being desired and being named are not the same measurement. Across these 10 brands, attachment tracks being named most closely (rank correlation 0.64).

10 brands · 60 AI answers · 137 dimension scores · measured, never estimated

Attraction Standing out in the answer: named first, described as superior, magnetic and influential.
Affinity Belonging in the answer: tied to identity, values and legitimacy, not just specifications.
Attachment Staying in the answer: recommended again, dependable, easy, part of the routine.
AttractionAffinityAttachment Each whorl lights one ring per index threshold cleared (90 / 96 / 102 / 108 / 115)
Sport

Budget Gymsupset

#Brand AttractionAffinityAttachment Desire shapeNamed in
1 David Lloyd Clubs: Attraction 110, Affinity 116, Attachment 101David Lloyd Clubs 110 116 101 Quietly trusted 13%
2 Third Space: Attraction 117, Affinity 111, Attachment 96Third Space 117 111 96 Magnetic but unbought 5%
3 PureGym: Attraction 100, Affinity 98, Attachment 111PureGym 100 98 111 Habit, not love 52%
4 Virgin Active: Attraction 106, Affinity 107, Attachment 96Virgin Active 106 107 96 Magnetic but unbought 3%
5 The Gym Group: Attraction 98, Affinity 96, Attachment 107The Gym Group 98 96 107 Habit, not love 85%
6 Gymbox: Attraction 103, Affinity 100, Attachment 96Gymbox 103 100 96 Magnetic but unbought 2%
7 Energie Fitness: Attraction 93, Affinity 87, Attachment 104Energie Fitness 93 87 104 Habit, not love 3%
8 JD Gyms: Attraction 93, Affinity 87, Attachment 104JD Gyms 93 87 104 Habit, not love 18%
9 Nuffield Health: Attraction 95, Affinity 104, Attachment 96Nuffield Health 95 104 96 Loved, not chosen 12%
10 DW Fitness First: Attraction 85, Affinity 94, Attachment 90DW Fitness First 85 94 90 Fading 7%

Indexed against the budget gyms average of 10 brands (100 = the category), measured across 60 AI answers in the latest weekly run.

Driver by driver

Where the category actually separates. A wide spread means assistants describe these brands very differently on that driver; a narrow one means it is table stakes.

Attraction

32-point spread · tracks being named -0.16
Third Space117
DW Fitness First85

The widest field of the three: this is where the category separates.

Affinity

29-point spread · tracks being named -0.16
David Lloyd Clubs116
JD Gyms87

Real separation, but not the category’s defining contest.

Attachment

21-point spread · tracks being named 0.64
PureGym111
DW Fitness First90

The tightest of the three: most brands land close together here.

The shapes AI leaves these brands in

Three indices make a profile, and profiles fall into recognisable shapes. A brand that is magnetic but unbought has a different problem from a habit nobody loves — and a different thing to build next.

Third Space: Attraction 117, Affinity 111, Attachment 96
Magnetic but unbought
AI admires it and forgets to recommend buying it again.
Third Space · Virgin Active · Gymbox
Build next: attachment
PureGym: Attraction 100, Affinity 98, Attachment 111
Habit, not love
Recommended for reliability and ease; nobody calls it exciting.
PureGym · The Gym Group · Energie Fitness · JD Gyms
Build next: attraction
David Lloyd Clubs: Attraction 110, Affinity 116, Attachment 101
Quietly trusted
Legitimacy carries it; it is rarely named first.
David Lloyd Clubs
Build next: attraction
Nuffield Health: Attraction 95, Affinity 104, Attachment 96
Loved, not chosen
Identity and values without superiority or habit.
Nuffield Health
Build next: attachment
DW Fitness First: Attraction 85, Affinity 94, Attachment 90
Fading
Below the benchmark everywhere; the answer has moved on.
DW Fitness First
Build next: attraction

What assistants actually talk about

The sixteen dimensions underneath the drivers, scored 0–10 on how the answers describe each brand. Spread is the distance between the strongest and weakest brand: the widest are where a brand can still separate itself, the narrowest are the price of entry.

Where brands separate

DimensionDriverCategory avgStrongestSpread
Value & Pricing Attachment 6.7 Energie Fitness 9.0 6.0
Differentiation vs Sameness Attraction 7.2 Third Space 9.0 3.0
Lifestyle Fit & Identity Affinity 7.4 David Lloyd Clubs 9.0 3.0
Style & Aesthetic Attraction 7.4 David Lloyd Clubs 9.0 3.0
Leadership & Momentum Attraction 7.5 PureGym 8.7 2.7

Where everyone reads alike

DimensionDriverCategory avgStrongestSpread
Heritage & Authority Affinity 7.4 David Lloyd Clubs 8.0 1.0
Ease of Use & Onboarding Attachment 7.5 The Gym Group 8.5 1.5
Trust & Credibility Affinity 7.8 David Lloyd Clubs 9.0 2.0
Customer Service & Support Attachment 6.7 David Lloyd Clubs 8.0 2.0
Reliability & Consistency Attachment 7.8 David Lloyd Clubs 9.0 2.0

Does desire track being recommended?

Rank correlation between a brand's driver index and the share of answers naming it, across the 10 indexed brands in this category. A relationship inside one run's answers — descriptive, never causal, and easily moved by a single brand at this sample size.

Attraction-0.16
Affinity-0.16
Attachment0.64

Method & limitations

Every week, each category runs a fixed set of unbranded consumer prompts against ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini. A separate model reads the answers and scores every brand named in them across 16 perception dimensions, 0–10. Those dimensions are grouped into the three Drivers of Desire from the Havas Science of Desire framework, and each brand's driver score is indexed against the average of every scored brand in its category — 100 is the category, 115 is fifteen per cent above it.

This measures how AI assistants describe brands in their answers. It is not a survey of people, and it is not an endorsement: the scores are a reading of machine-generated text at the time of the run, and relationships between drivers and how often a brand is named are correlational. A brand needs at least six scored dimensions in a run to be indexed, and a category needs at least four such brands to get a board. See the full methodology.