Converged.AI × BrandInsightAI
BrandInsightAI Insights
Insurance · refreshed weekly

How AI wants car insurance

Car Insurance is decided on attachment: NFU Mutual indexes 110 there against Direct Line at 90, a 20-point spread. Affinity separates almost nobody (10 points across the whole category), so being described that way is table stakes here rather than an advantage. Cuvva holds the strongest overall profile, indexing 107 against the category average: chosen, not loved. But the brand assistants name most often is Admiral, not the category's market leader: being desired and being named are not the same measurement.

13 brands · 60 AI answers · 110 dimension scores · measured, never estimated

Attraction Standing out in the answer: named first, described as superior, magnetic and influential.
Affinity Belonging in the answer: tied to identity, values and legitimacy, not just specifications.
Attachment Staying in the answer: recommended again, dependable, easy, part of the routine.
AttractionAffinityAttachment Each whorl lights one ring per index threshold cleared (90 / 96 / 102 / 108 / 115)

100 = the average brand in the same category.100 = the average brand across every category in the index.

Insurance

Car Insuranceupset

#Brand AttractionAffinityAttachment SummaryNamed in
1 Cuvva: Attraction 110, Affinity 100, Attachment 107Cuvva: Attraction 117, Affinity 110, Attachment 114Cuvva 110117 100110 107114 Chosen, not lovedAhead on all three 3%
2 Aviva: Attraction 105, Affinity 100, Attachment 103Aviva: Attraction 112, Affinity 110, Attachment 110Aviva 105112 100110 103110 Noticed, not returned toAhead on all three 13%
3 NFU Mutual: Attraction 101, Affinity 103, Attachment 110NFU Mutual: Attraction 107, Affinity 113, Attachment 117NFU Mutual 101107 103113 110117 Relied on, not excitingAhead on all three 3%
4 Saga: Attraction 103, Affinity 100, Attachment 97Saga: Attraction 110, Affinity 110, Attachment 103Saga 103110 100110 97103 Average on all threeNoticed, not returned to 3%
5 Marmalade: Attraction 103, Affinity 100, Attachment 97Marmalade: Attraction 110, Affinity 110, Attachment 103Marmalade 103110 100110 97103 Average on all threeNoticed, not returned to 5%
6 LV=: Attraction 99, Affinity 99, Attachment 103LV=: Attraction 106, Affinity 109, Attachment 110LV= 99106 99109 103110 Average on all threeAhead on all three 10%
7 Admiral: Attraction 97, Affinity 100, Attachment 102Admiral: Attraction 103, Affinity 110, Attachment 109Admiral 97103 100110 102109 Average on all threeCredible, not first choice 20%
8 RAC: Attraction 97, Affinity 104, Attachment 101RAC: Attraction 103, Affinity 114, Attachment 107RAC 97103 104114 101107 Credible, not first choiceCredible, not first choice 5%
9 Zego: Attraction 101, Affinity n/a, Attachment 97Zego: Attraction 107, Affinity n/a, Attachment 103Zego 101107 —— 97103 Average on all threeNoticed, not returned to 5%
10 Hastings Direct: Attraction 96, Affinity 100, Attachment 97Hastings Direct: Attraction 102, Affinity 110, Attachment 103Hastings Direct 96102 100110 97103 Credible, not first choiceCredible, not first choice 15%
11 Tempcover: Attraction 93, Affinity 94, Attachment 103Tempcover: Attraction 99, Affinity 103, Attachment 110Tempcover 9399 94103 103110 Relied on, not excitingRelied on, not exciting 3%
12 AA: Attraction 99, Affinity 98, Attachment 93AA: Attraction 106, Affinity 108, Attachment 99AA 99106 98108 9399 Noticed, not returned toCredible, not first choice 7%
13 Direct Line: Attraction 96, Affinity 100, Attachment 90Direct Line: Attraction 102, Affinity 110, Attachment 96Direct Line 96102 100110 9096 Liked, not chosenCredible, not first choice 5%

Indexed against the average of the 13 indexed car insurance brands, so 100 is the category average and a brand is read against the rivals it actually competes with.Indexed against the average of every indexed brand in the whole index — 1,605 brands across 61 categories — so 100 is the average brand anywhere here and a number reads the same on every board. 13 car insurance brands, measured across 60 AI answers in the latest weekly run.

Driver by driver

Where the category actually separates. A wide spread means assistants describe these brands very differently on that driver; a narrow one means it is table stakes.

Attachment

20-point spread · tracks being named -0.24
NFU Mutual110
Direct Line90

The widest field of the three: this is where the category separates.

Attraction

17-point spread · tracks being named -0.24
Cuvva110
Tempcover93

Real separation, but not the category’s defining contest.

Affinity

10-point spread · tracks being named -0.10
RAC104
Tempcover94

The tightest of the three: most brands land close together here.

Where each brand stands

Each brand's three indices, summed up in a line: which drivers it is ahead on, which it is behind on, and the one to build next. A brand that is noticed but not returned to has a different problem from one that is relied on but not exciting.

Aviva: Attraction 105, Affinity 100, Attachment 103
Noticed, not returned to
Attraction is its strongest driver; attachment trails behind it.
Aviva · AA
Build next: attachment
NFU Mutual: Attraction 101, Affinity 103, Attachment 110
Relied on, not exciting
Attachment is its strongest driver; attraction trails behind it.
NFU Mutual · Tempcover
Build next: attraction
RAC: Attraction 97, Affinity 104, Attachment 101
Credible, not first choice
Affinity (identity, values, legitimacy) is its strongest driver.
RAC · Hastings Direct
Build next: attraction
Direct Line: Attraction 96, Affinity 100, Attachment 90
Liked, not chosen
Affinity is its strongest driver; attachment is below average.
Direct Line
Build next: attachment
Saga: Attraction 103, Affinity 100, Attachment 97
Average on all three
Close to average on every driver.
Saga · Marmalade · LV= · Admiral · Zego
Build next: attraction
Cuvva: Attraction 110, Affinity 100, Attachment 107
Chosen, not loved
Attraction and attachment are ahead; affinity trails behind them.
Cuvva
Build next: affinity
Cuvva: Attraction 117, Affinity 110, Attachment 114
Ahead on all three
Above average on attraction, affinity and attachment.
Cuvva · Aviva · NFU Mutual · LV=
No driver is behind; protect the lead.
Saga: Attraction 110, Affinity 110, Attachment 103
Noticed, not returned to
Attraction is its strongest driver; attachment trails behind it.
Saga · Marmalade · Zego
Build next: attachment
Tempcover: Attraction 99, Affinity 103, Attachment 110
Relied on, not exciting
Attachment is its strongest driver; attraction trails behind it.
Tempcover
Build next: attraction
Admiral: Attraction 103, Affinity 110, Attachment 109
Credible, not first choice
Affinity (identity, values, legitimacy) is its strongest driver.
Admiral · RAC · Hastings Direct · AA · Direct Line
Build next: attraction

What assistants actually talk about

The sixteen dimensions underneath the drivers, scored 0–10 on how the answers describe each brand. Spread is the distance between the strongest and weakest brand: the widest are where a brand can still separate itself, the narrowest are the price of entry.

Where brands separate

DimensionDriverCategory avgStrongestSpread
Quality & Performance Attraction 7.5 NFU Mutual 8.5 1.5
Customer Service & Support Attachment 7.7 NFU Mutual 8.5 1.5
Differentiation vs Sameness Attraction 7.4 Cuvva 8.5 1.5
Innovation & Technology Attraction 7.5 Cuvva 8.5 1.5
Ease of Use & Onboarding Attachment 7.9 Tempcover 8.5 1.5

Where everyone reads alike

DimensionDriverCategory avgStrongestSpread
Value & Pricing Attraction 7.4 Aviva 7.7 0.7
Heritage & Authority Attraction 8.0 RAC 8.5 0.8
Lifestyle Fit & Identity Affinity 7.8 Saga 8.0 1.0
Boldness & Creativity Attraction 7.7 Zego 8.0 1.0
Reliability & Consistency Affinity 8.1 NFU Mutual 9.0 1.0

Does desire track being recommended?

Rank correlation between a brand's driver index and the share of answers naming it, across the 13 indexed brands in this category. A relationship inside one run's answers — descriptive, never causal, and easily moved by a single brand at this sample size.

Attraction-0.24
Affinity-0.10
Attachment-0.24

Method & limitations

Every week, each category runs a fixed set of unbranded consumer prompts against ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini. A separate model reads the answers and scores every brand named in them across 16 perception dimensions, 0–10. Those dimensions are grouped into the three Drivers of Desire from the Havas Science of Desire framework, and each brand's driver score is indexed against the average brand in its own category — 100 is the category average, 115 is fifteen per cent above it. The Vs all categories switch re-indexes the same scores against the average of every indexed brand across every category, so boards can be read against each other; the ranking inside a category is the same either way. Each category's own average, indexed against the whole index, is its place in the category table. The summary beside each brand describes where it stands on the three drivers against whichever benchmark is showing: above 104 counts as ahead, below 96 as behind.

This measures how AI assistants describe brands in their answers. It is not a survey of people, and it is not an endorsement: the scores are a reading of machine-generated text at the time of the run, and relationships between drivers and how often a brand is named are correlational. A brand needs at least six scored dimensions in a run to be indexed, and a category needs at least four such brands to get a board. See the full methodology.