Converged.AI × BrandInsightAI
BrandInsightAI Insights
Technology · refreshed weekly

How AI wants security software & vpns

Have I Been Pwned is the most desired security software & vpns brand the answers name: Desire 74% of maximum, above indifference. 10% of the 51 brands rated sit above indifference; the rest leave the models indifferent. The category is most divided on values & integrity. The brand the answers name most often is Microsoft Defender, not the category's market leader.

51 brands rated · 35 named in the answers · 60 AI answers behind presence · rated by ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini

Attraction Standing out: seen as superior, magnetic and influential.
Affinity Belonging: tied to identity, values and legitimacy, not just specifications.
Attachment Being returned to: an emotional bond, a dependable experience, part of the routine.
AttractionAffinityAttachment Each whorl lights one ring per index threshold cleared (84 / 92 / 100 / 108 / 116)

Indices: 100 = the average brand in the same category.Indices: 100 = the average brand across every category in the index. Desire % and status are absolute and read the same either way.

Security Software & VPNs

Every brand, named first

10% above indifference · 90% indifferent · 0% below · 51 brands

#Brand Desire indexDesire %Status AttractionAffinityAttachment SummaryNamed in
1 Have I Been Pwned: Attraction 132, Affinity 128, Attachment 127Have I Been Pwned: Attraction 122, Affinity 129, Attachment 121Have I Been Pwned 129124 74% Above indifference 132122 128129 127121 Ahead on all threeAhead on all three 2%
2 1Password: Attraction 124, Affinity 121, Attachment 1301Password: Attraction 114, Affinity 122, Attachment 1241Password 125120 72% Above indifference 124114 121122 130124 Ahead on all threeAhead on all three 3%
3 Bitwarden: Attraction 121, Affinity 121, Attachment 122Bitwarden: Attraction 111, Affinity 122, Attachment 116Bitwarden 121116 70% Above indifference 121111 121122 122116 Ahead on all threeAhead on all three 3%
4 ClearScore: Attraction 122, Affinity 106, Attachment 128ClearScore: Attraction 112, Affinity 107, Attachment 122ClearScore 118114 68% Above indifference 122112 106107 128122 Chosen, not lovedChosen, not loved 2%
5 Dashlane: Attraction 114, Affinity 111, Attachment 120Dashlane: Attraction 105, Affinity 112, Attachment 114Dashlane 115110 66% Indifferent 114105 111112 120114 Ahead on all threeRelied on, not exciting 3%
6 Google Family Link: Attraction 109, Affinity 107, Attachment 123Google Family Link: Attraction 101, Affinity 108, Attachment 117Google Family Link 113109 65% Indifferent 109101 107108 123117 Relied on, not excitingRelied on, not exciting 8%
7 Bitdefender: Attraction 117, Affinity 109, Attachment 114Bitdefender: Attraction 107, Affinity 110, Attachment 109Bitdefender 113109 65% Indifferent 117107 109110 114109 Chosen, not lovedCredible, not first choice 28%
8 Microsoft Defender: Attraction 108, Affinity 106, Attachment 122Microsoft Defender: Attraction 100, Affinity 107, Attachment 117Microsoft Defender 112108 65% Indifferent 108100 106107 122117 Relied on, not excitingRelied on, not exciting 35%
9 ESET: Attraction 114, Affinity 114, Attachment 107ESET: Attraction 105, Affinity 114, Attachment 102ESET 112107 64% Indifferent 114105 114114 107102 Noticed, not returned toCredible, not first choice 5%
10 Malwarebytes: Attraction 116, Affinity 107, Attachment 109Malwarebytes: Attraction 107, Affinity 108, Attachment 104Malwarebytes 111106 64% Indifferent 116107 107108 109104 Noticed, not returned toAverage on all three 5%
11 Credit Karma: Attraction 112, Affinity 100, Attachment 117Credit Karma: Attraction 103, Affinity 101, Attachment 112Credit Karma 109105 63% Indifferent 112103 100101 117112 Chosen, not lovedRelied on, not exciting 2%
12 7-Zip: Attraction 111, Affinity 111, Attachment 1037-Zip: Attraction 102, Affinity 112, Attachment 997-Zip 109105 63% Indifferent 111102 111112 10399 Noticed, not returned toCredible, not first choice 3%
13 CrowdStrike: Attraction 112, Affinity 107, Attachment 101CrowdStrike: Attraction 103, Affinity 108, Attachment 97CrowdStrike 107103 62% Indifferent 112103 107108 10197 Noticed, not returned toAverage on all three 3%
14 Trezor: Attraction 111, Affinity 108, Attachment 101Trezor: Attraction 102, Affinity 109, Attachment 96Trezor 106102 61% Indifferent 111102 108109 10196 Noticed, not returned toAverage on all three 3%
15 F-Secure: Attraction 106, Affinity 114, Attachment 98F-Secure: Attraction 97, Affinity 114, Attachment 93F-Secure 106102 61% Indifferent 10697 114114 9893 Credible, not first choiceCredible, not first choice 2%
16 VeraCrypt: Attraction 102, Affinity 115, Attachment 97VeraCrypt: Attraction 94, Affinity 116, Attachment 92VeraCrypt 105101 60% Indifferent 10294 115116 9792 Credible, not first choiceCredible, not first choice 5%
17 Cryptomator: Attraction 105, Affinity 115, Attachment 92Cryptomator: Attraction 97, Affinity 116, Attachment 88Cryptomator 105101 60% Indifferent 10597 115116 9288 Credible, not first choiceCredible, not first choice 3%
18 SentinelOne: Attraction 109, Affinity 103, Attachment 103SentinelOne: Attraction 101, Affinity 104, Attachment 98SentinelOne 105101 61% Indifferent 109101 103104 10398 Average on all threeAverage on all three 2%
19 Cifas: Attraction 101, Affinity 106, Attachment 104Cifas: Attraction 93, Affinity 107, Attachment 99Cifas 104100 60% Indifferent 10193 106107 10499 Average on all threeAverage on all three 12%
20 Ledger: Attraction 108, Affinity 96, Attachment 101Ledger: Attraction 99, Affinity 96, Attachment 97Ledger 10197 58% Indifferent 10899 9696 10197 Average on all threeAverage on all three 5%
21 BitLocker: Attraction 99, Affinity 101, Attachment 104BitLocker: Attraction 91, Affinity 102, Attachment 99BitLocker 10198 59% Indifferent 9991 101102 10499 Average on all threeAverage on all three 13%
22 Experian: Attraction 91, Affinity 92, Attachment 106Experian: Attraction 84, Affinity 93, Attachment 101Experian 9693 56% Indifferent 9184 9293 106101 Average on all threeRelied on, not exciting 13%
23 Norton: Attraction 89, Affinity 94, Attachment 95Norton: Attraction 82, Affinity 95, Attachment 91Norton 9389 54% Indifferent 8982 9495 9591 Relied on, not excitingCredible, not first choice 27%
24 Avast: Attraction 98, Affinity 86, Attachment 97Avast: Attraction 90, Affinity 87, Attachment 92Avast 9390 54% Indifferent 9890 8687 9792 Noticed, not returned toRelied on, not exciting 8%
25 McAfee: Attraction 89, Affinity 92, Attachment 94McAfee: Attraction 82, Affinity 93, Attachment 90McAfee 9288 53% Indifferent 8982 9293 9490 Relied on, not excitingLiked, not chosen 20%
26 Sophos: Attraction 87, Affinity 99, Attachment 83Sophos: Attraction 80, Affinity 100, Attachment 79Sophos 9087 52% Indifferent 8780 99100 8379 Liked, not chosenLiked, not chosen 3%
27 AVG: Attraction 89, Affinity 90, Attachment 92AVG: Attraction 82, Affinity 91, Attachment 88AVG 9087 52% Indifferent 8982 9091 9288 Relied on, not excitingLiked, not chosen 3%
28 FileVault: Attraction 82, Affinity 98, Attachment 90FileVault: Attraction 76, Affinity 99, Attachment 85FileVault 9087 52% Indifferent 8276 9899 9085 Liked, not chosenLiked, not chosen 10%
29 Kaspersky: Attraction 98, Affinity 79, Attachment 89Kaspersky: Attraction 90, Affinity 79, Attachment 85Kaspersky 8885 51% Indifferent 9890 7979 8985 Noticed, not returned toBehind on all three 8%
30 TransUnion: Attraction 79, Affinity 89, Attachment 93TransUnion: Attraction 73, Affinity 89, Attachment 89TransUnion 8784 50% Indifferent 7973 8989 9389 Relied on, not excitingBehind on all three 10%
31 Panda Security: Attraction 86, Affinity 88, Attachment 82Panda Security: Attraction 80, Affinity 89, Attachment 78Panda Security 8682 49% Indifferent 8680 8889 8278 Behind on all threeBehind on all three 2%
32 Avira: Attraction 84, Affinity 88, Attachment 86Avira: Attraction 78, Affinity 89, Attachment 82Avira 8683 50% Indifferent 8478 8889 8682 Behind on all threeBehind on all three 3%
33 AxCrypt: Attraction 76, Affinity 88, Attachment 71AxCrypt: Attraction 70, Affinity 89, Attachment 67AxCrypt 7976 45% Indifferent 7670 8889 7167 Behind on all threeBehind on all three 3%
34 Equifax: Attraction 70, Affinity 66, Attachment 81Equifax: Attraction 64, Affinity 66, Attachment 77Equifax 7269 41% Indifferent 7064 6666 8177 Behind on all threeBehind on all three 10%
35 TotalAV: Attraction 72, Affinity 71, Attachment 71TotalAV: Attraction 67, Affinity 71, Attachment 67TotalAV 7168 41% Indifferent 7267 7171 7167 Behind on all threeBehind on all three 2%
Rated but never named (16)

The models rated these brands when asked, but none of the category's answers named them.

#Brand Desire indexDesire %Status AttractionAffinityAttachment SummaryNamed in
— ProtonVPN: Attraction 119, Affinity 121, Attachment 117ProtonVPN: Attraction 110, Affinity 122, Attachment 112ProtonVPN 119115 69% Above indifference 119110 121122 117112 Ahead on all threeAhead on all three 0%
— ExpressVPN: Attraction 118, Affinity 109, Attachment 112ExpressVPN: Attraction 109, Affinity 110, Attachment 107ExpressVPN 113109 65% Indifferent 118109 109110 112107 Chosen, not lovedCredible, not first choice 0%
— Keeper Security: Attraction 109, Affinity 111, Attachment 113Keeper Security: Attraction 101, Affinity 112, Attachment 107Keeper Security 111107 64% Indifferent 109101 111112 113107 Relied on, not excitingCredible, not first choice 0%
— NordVPN: Attraction 114, Affinity 104, Attachment 112NordVPN: Attraction 105, Affinity 105, Attachment 107NordVPN 110105 63% Indifferent 114105 104105 112107 Chosen, not lovedAverage on all three 0%
— Private Internet Access: Attraction 106, Affinity 104, Attachment 106Private Internet Access: Attraction 97, Affinity 105, Attachment 101Private Internet Access 105101 61% Indifferent 10697 104105 106101 Average on all threeAverage on all three 0%
— Surfshark: Attraction 108, Affinity 98, Attachment 106Surfshark: Attraction 99, Affinity 98, Attachment 101Surfshark 104100 60% Indifferent 10899 9898 106101 Average on all threeAverage on all three 0%
— GnuPG: Attraction 99, Affinity 116, Attachment 87GnuPG: Attraction 91, Affinity 117, Attachment 83GnuPG 10197 58% Indifferent 9991 116117 8783 Credible, not first choiceCredible, not first choice 0%
— CyberGhost: Attraction 104, Affinity 96, Attachment 103CyberGhost: Attraction 96, Affinity 97, Attachment 99CyberGhost 10197 58% Indifferent 10496 9697 10399 Average on all threeAverage on all three 0%
— CleanBrowsing: Attraction 90, Affinity 97, Attachment 94CleanBrowsing: Attraction 83, Affinity 98, Attachment 90CleanBrowsing 9490 54% Indifferent 9083 9798 9490 Credible, not first choiceLiked, not chosen 0%
— Intego: Attraction 93, Affinity 96, Attachment 88Intego: Attraction 86, Affinity 97, Attachment 84Intego 9389 53% Indifferent 9386 9697 8884 Liked, not chosenLiked, not chosen 0%
— OpenDNS: Attraction 89, Affinity 98, Attachment 87OpenDNS: Attraction 82, Affinity 99, Attachment 83OpenDNS 9288 53% Indifferent 8982 9899 8783 Liked, not chosenLiked, not chosen 0%
— Trend Micro: Attraction 86, Affinity 94, Attachment 89Trend Micro: Attraction 79, Affinity 94, Attachment 85Trend Micro 9086 52% Indifferent 8679 9494 8985 Liked, not chosenLiked, not chosen 0%
— LastPass: Attraction 86, Affinity 75, Attachment 101LastPass: Attraction 80, Affinity 76, Attachment 96LastPass 8784 50% Indifferent 8680 7576 10196 Relied on, not excitingRelied on, not exciting 0%
— Atlas VPN: Attraction 84, Affinity 84, Attachment 77Atlas VPN: Attraction 77, Affinity 84, Attachment 73Atlas VPN 8278 47% Indifferent 8477 8484 7773 Behind on all threeBehind on all three 0%
— Webroot: Attraction 76, Affinity 85, Attachment 78Webroot: Attraction 70, Affinity 86, Attachment 74Webroot 8077 46% Indifferent 7670 8586 7874 Behind on all threeBehind on all three 0%
— BullGuard: Attraction 76, Affinity 87, Attachment 76BullGuard: Attraction 70, Affinity 88, Attachment 73BullGuard 8077 46% Indifferent 7670 8788 7673 Behind on all threeBehind on all three 0%

Indexed against the average of the 51 indexed security software & vpns brands, so 100 is the category average and a brand is read against the rivals it actually competes with.Indexed against the average of every indexed brand in the whole index — 2,582 brands across 67 categories — so 100 is the average brand anywhere here and a number reads the same on every board. 51 security software & vpns brands rated by the assistants in the latest weekly run; Named in is the share of 60 AI answers that name each brand.

Feature profile

What this category is rated on

The brands are most divided on values & integrity: Have I Been Pwned is rated 5.9 and TotalAV 2.9 on the 1–7 scale, a spread of 122 against the feature's usual spread (100 = as contested as usual). Against every category, security software & vpns is rated highest on perceived superiority (104) and lowest on emotional magnetism (66).

FeatureDriverCategory meanVs all categories
Perceived superiority Attraction 4.6/7 104
Emotional magnetism Attraction 2.4/7 66
Positive influence Attraction 4.6/7 102
Identity & belonging Affinity 3.6/7 96
Values & integrity contested Affinity 4.2/7 101
Trust & legitimacy Affinity 5.3/7 104
Emotional bond Attachment 4.0/7 97
Reinforced experience Attachment 3.5/7 91
Part of my routine Attachment 4.1/7 98

A feature's category mean is the average of its brands' ratings, 1–7. Vs all categories indexes it against every indexed brand across every category (100 = the average brand anywhere). The contested feature is the one the category's brands are most spread on, measured against how spread that feature usually is.

Stated vs revealed

Rated well is not the same as named

Across the 51 brands, how highly the models rate a brand when asked and how often their answers name it barely go together (rank correlation 0.06).

Rated well, rarely named

  • Have I Been Pwned74% Desire · named in 2%
  • 1Password72% Desire · named in 3%
  • Bitwarden70% Desire · named in 3%
  • ProtonVPN69% Desire · named in 0%
  • ClearScore68% Desire · named in 2%

Showing 5 of 21.

Named, not desired

  • Microsoft Defendernamed in 35% · 65% Desire
  • Bitdefendernamed in 28% · 65% Desire
  • Nortonnamed in 27% · 54% Desire
  • McAfeenamed in 20% · 53% Desire
  • BitLockernamed in 13% · 59% Desire

Showing 5 of 13.

Rated well, rarely named: Desire above the category median, named in 5% of answers or fewer. Named, not desired: among the most-named quarter of the category, yet indifferent or below. A relationship inside one week's run, never a cause.

Model agreement

Where the models disagree

The models broadly agree on these brands (mean correlation 0.86 across 3 pairs: ChatGPT–Claude 0.85 · ChatGPT–Gemini 0.88 · Claude–Gemini 0.85). Still, 252 of 1,581 brand-statement ratings (16%) split by 2 points or more on the 1–7 scale, and the typical brand's Desire differs by 11 points between its most and least generous model.

BrandStatementRated highestRated lowest
7-ZipWealth ChatGPT 6 Claude 2
BitwardenWould miss it Gemini 7 Claude 4
CifasQuality of life Gemini 6 ChatGPT 3
CifasWealth Gemini 5 ChatGPT 2
CleanBrowsingWould miss it Gemini 5 Claude 2

The widest 5 of 252 splits.

Across the whole index, on the same brands: Gemini rates +4.5 points of Desire % against its peers; ChatGPT rates −1.7 points of Desire % against its peers; Claude rates −3.0 points of Desire % against its peers. A generous model lifts every brand it rates, which is why scores are combined across models and indexed within the category.

Distinctive statements

What sets the leading brands apart

For the category's leading named brands, the glossary statements each is rated furthest above and below the category's average, in points on the 1–7 scale.

Have I Been Pwned
Above the categoryUnique +2.4, Transparent +2.2, Integrity +2.1
Below the categoryExclusive experience −0.7, Healthy −0.5, Self-expression −0.4
1Password
Above the categorySimplify +1.7, Advocacy +1.7, Customer experience +1.7
Below the categoryGood value −0.4
Bitwarden
Above the categoryTransparent +1.8, Advocacy +1.7, Good value +1.6
Below the categoryUnique −0.7, Exclusive experience −0.0, Connecting −0.0
ClearScore
Above the categoryWealth +2.5, Good feeling +1.5, Happiness +1.4
Below the categorySafe products −0.6, Trust −0.1, Quality products −0.1
Dashlane
Above the categorySimplify +1.4, Digital experience +1.3, Innovative +1.3
Below the categoryGood value −0.4, Healthy −0.2, Self-expression −0.1
Supporting evidence

What the answers say

The category's answers say enough to judge 53 of the 1,581 brand-statement ratings (3.4%). Of those, 70% back the rating, 6% lean against it and the rest are mixed. The answers were not written to describe every brand on every statement, so this is a check on the ratings, not a second score. Counts only; no answer text is published.

Method & limitations

Every week, ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini are each asked directly, the way a survey asks a respondent, to rate every brand in the category on the 31 statements of the Havas Science of Desire glossary, on the survey's own 1–7 agreement scale. Statements roll up to nine features and the three Drivers of Desire (a feature is the mean of its statements; a driver is the sum of its three features, out of 21; Desire is the sum of the drivers, out of 63). Each brand is indexed against the average brand in its own category — 100 is the category average, 115 is fifteen per cent above it — and the Vs all categories switch re-indexes the same scores against every indexed brand in the index. Desire % is Desire as a share of its maximum. A brand is above indifference when its Desire is above two-thirds of its maximum (42 of 63), below indifference at or under one-third (21), and indifferent in between. The summary beside each brand says where it stands on the three drivers: an index of 110 or more counts as ahead, 90 or less as behind.

These are the assistants' own ratings when asked. They are not a survey of people and not an endorsement, and they are not read from what the assistants happen to say in an answer: the answers to the category's unbranded consumer prompts are used only to count how often each brand is named, and as supporting evidence. Relationships between ratings and how often a brand is named are correlational. A brand is indexed only when all 31 statements have been rated in a run by at least two models, and a category needs at least 4 such brands to get a board. See the full methodology.