Converged.AI × BrandInsightAI
BrandInsightAI Insights
Travel · refreshed weekly

How AI wants budget hotels

Budget Hotels is decided on affinity: Premier Inn indexes 115 there against Point A Hotels at 92, a 23-point spread. Premier Inn holds the strongest overall profile, indexing 111 against the category average: ahead on all three. Across these 5 brands, attraction tracks being named most closely (rank correlation 1.00).

5 brands · 60 AI answers · 73 dimension scores · measured, never estimated

Attraction Standing out in the answer: named first, described as superior, magnetic and influential.
Affinity Belonging in the answer: tied to identity, values and legitimacy, not just specifications.
Attachment Staying in the answer: recommended again, dependable, easy, part of the routine.
AttractionAffinityAttachment Each whorl lights one ring per index threshold cleared (90 / 96 / 102 / 108 / 115)

100 = the average brand in the same category.100 = the average brand across every category in the index.

Travel

Budget Hotels

#Brand AttractionAffinityAttachment SummaryNamed in
1 Premier Inn: Attraction 109, Affinity 115, Attachment 110Premier Inn: Attraction 93, Affinity 98, Attachment 103Premier Inn 10993 11598 110103 Ahead on all threeRelied on, not exciting 38%
2 Travelodge: Attraction 101, Affinity 99, Attachment 102Travelodge: Attraction 86, Affinity 84, Attachment 96Travelodge 10186 9984 10296 Average on all threeBehind on all three 35%
3 ibis: Attraction 99, Affinity 95, Attachment 99ibis: Attraction 85, Affinity 81, Attachment 93ibis 9985 9581 9993 Noticed, not returned toBehind on all three 30%
4 Holiday Inn Express: Attraction 98, Affinity 99, Attachment 98Holiday Inn Express: Attraction 83, Affinity 84, Attachment 92Holiday Inn Express 9883 9984 9892 Average on all threeBehind on all three 12%
5 Point A Hotels: Attraction 93, Affinity 92, Attachment 91Point A Hotels: Attraction 79, Affinity 79, Attachment 85Point A Hotels 9379 9279 9185 Behind on all threeBehind on all three 5%

Indexed against the average of the 5 indexed budget hotels brands, so 100 is the category average and a brand is read against the rivals it actually competes with.Indexed against the average of every indexed brand in the whole index — 1,605 brands across 61 categories — so 100 is the average brand anywhere here and a number reads the same on every board. 5 budget hotels brands, measured across 60 AI answers in the latest weekly run.

Driver by driver

Where the category actually separates. A wide spread means assistants describe these brands very differently on that driver; a narrow one means it is table stakes.

Affinity

23-point spread · tracks being named 0.82
Premier Inn115
Point A Hotels92

The widest field of the three: this is where the category separates.

Attachment

19-point spread · tracks being named 1.00
Premier Inn110
Point A Hotels91

Real separation, but not the category’s defining contest.

Attraction

16-point spread · tracks being named 1.00
Premier Inn109
Point A Hotels93

The tightest of the three: most brands land close together here.

Where each brand stands

Each brand's three indices, summed up in a line: which drivers it is ahead on, which it is behind on, and the one to build next. A brand that is noticed but not returned to has a different problem from one that is relied on but not exciting.

Premier Inn: Attraction 109, Affinity 115, Attachment 110
Ahead on all three
Above average on attraction, affinity and attachment.
Premier Inn
No driver is behind; protect the lead.
ibis: Attraction 99, Affinity 95, Attachment 99
Noticed, not returned to
Attraction is its strongest driver; attachment trails behind it.
ibis
Build next: attachment
Travelodge: Attraction 101, Affinity 99, Attachment 102
Average on all three
Close to average on every driver.
Travelodge · Holiday Inn Express
Build next: attraction
Point A Hotels: Attraction 93, Affinity 92, Attachment 91
Behind on all three
Below average on attraction, affinity and attachment.
Point A Hotels
Build next: attraction
Premier Inn: Attraction 93, Affinity 98, Attachment 103
Relied on, not exciting
Attachment is its strongest driver; attraction trails behind it.
Premier Inn
Build next: attraction
Travelodge: Attraction 86, Affinity 84, Attachment 96
Behind on all three
Below average on attraction, affinity and attachment.
Travelodge · ibis · Holiday Inn Express · Point A Hotels
Build next: attraction

What assistants actually talk about

The sixteen dimensions underneath the drivers, scored 0–10 on how the answers describe each brand. Spread is the distance between the strongest and weakest brand: the widest are where a brand can still separate itself, the narrowest are the price of entry.

Where brands separate

DimensionDriverCategory avgStrongestSpread
Heritage & Authority Attraction 7.4 Premier Inn 8.5 3.5
Leadership & Momentum Attraction 6.6 Premier Inn 7.5 2.5
Range & Availability Attachment 7.0 Premier Inn 8.0 2.5
Trust & Credibility Affinity 6.8 Premier Inn 8.0 2.0
Reliability & Consistency Affinity 6.8 Premier Inn 8.0 2.0

Where everyone reads alike

DimensionDriverCategory avgStrongestSpread
Ease of Use & Onboarding Attachment 7.1 Premier Inn 7.5 0.5
Differentiation vs Sameness Attraction 5.7 Premier Inn 6.0 0.5
Boldness & Creativity Attraction 4.9 Premier Inn 5.0 0.5
Value & Pricing Attraction 6.8 Premier Inn 7.3 1.0
Customer Service & Support Attachment 6.4 Premier Inn 7.0 1.0

Does desire track being recommended?

Rank correlation between a brand's driver index and the share of answers naming it, across the 5 indexed brands in this category. A relationship inside one run's answers — descriptive, never causal, and easily moved by a single brand at this sample size.

Attraction1.00
Affinity0.82
Attachment1.00

Method & limitations

Every week, each category runs a fixed set of unbranded consumer prompts against ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini. A separate model reads the answers and scores every brand named in them across 16 perception dimensions, 0–10. Those dimensions are grouped into the three Drivers of Desire from the Havas Science of Desire framework, and each brand's driver score is indexed against the average brand in its own category — 100 is the category average, 115 is fifteen per cent above it. The Vs all categories switch re-indexes the same scores against the average of every indexed brand across every category, so boards can be read against each other; the ranking inside a category is the same either way. Each category's own average, indexed against the whole index, is its place in the category table. The summary beside each brand describes where it stands on the three drivers against whichever benchmark is showing: above 104 counts as ahead, below 96 as behind.

This measures how AI assistants describe brands in their answers. It is not a survey of people, and it is not an endorsement: the scores are a reading of machine-generated text at the time of the run, and relationships between drivers and how often a brand is named are correlational. A brand needs at least six scored dimensions in a run to be indexed, and a category needs at least four such brands to get a board. See the full methodology.