Converged.AI × BrandInsightAI
BrandInsightAI Insights
Travel · refreshed weekly

How AI wants budget hotels

Premier Inn is the most desired budget hotels brand the answers name: Desire 71% of maximum, above indifference. 14% of the 28 brands rated sit above indifference; the rest leave the models indifferent. The category is most divided on emotional magnetism.

28 brands rated · 13 named in the answers · 60 AI answers behind presence · rated by ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini

Attraction Standing out: seen as superior, magnetic and influential.
Affinity Belonging: tied to identity, values and legitimacy, not just specifications.
Attachment Being returned to: an emotional bond, a dependable experience, part of the routine.
AttractionAffinityAttachment Each whorl lights one ring per index threshold cleared (84 / 92 / 100 / 108 / 116)

Indices: 100 = the average brand in the same category.Indices: 100 = the average brand across every category in the index. Desire % and status are absolute and read the same either way.

Budget Hotels

Every brand, named first

14% above indifference · 86% indifferent · 0% below · 28 brands

#Brand Desire indexDesire %Status AttractionAffinityAttachment SummaryNamed in
1 Premier Inn: Attraction 119, Affinity 116, Attachment 124Premier Inn: Attraction 121, Affinity 116, Attachment 120Premier Inn 120119 71% Above indifference 119121 116116 124120 Ahead on all threeAhead on all three 40%
2 Holiday Inn: Attraction 104, Affinity 112, Attachment 110Holiday Inn: Attraction 105, Affinity 112, Attachment 107Holiday Inn 109108 65% Indifferent 104105 112112 110107 Credible, not first choiceCredible, not first choice 5%
3 Hampton by Hilton: Attraction 106, Affinity 108, Attachment 103Hampton by Hilton: Attraction 107, Affinity 108, Attachment 99Hampton by Hilton 106105 63% Indifferent 106107 108108 10399 Average on all threeAverage on all three 2%
4 Crowne Plaza: Attraction 106, Affinity 106, Attachment 105Crowne Plaza: Attraction 107, Affinity 106, Attachment 102Crowne Plaza 106105 63% Indifferent 106107 106106 105102 Average on all threeAverage on all three 2%
5 Holiday Inn Express: Attraction 97, Affinity 110, Attachment 107Holiday Inn Express: Attraction 99, Affinity 111, Attachment 104Holiday Inn Express 105104 63% Indifferent 9799 110111 107104 Credible, not first choiceCredible, not first choice 5%
6 Z Hotels: Attraction 106, Affinity 98, Attachment 105Z Hotels: Attraction 107, Affinity 98, Attachment 102Z Hotels 103102 61% Indifferent 106107 9898 105102 Average on all threeAverage on all three 2%
7 ibis: Attraction 101, Affinity 102, Attachment 101ibis: Attraction 102, Affinity 102, Attachment 98ibis 101101 60% Indifferent 101102 102102 10198 Average on all threeAverage on all three 23%
8 The Pilgrm: Attraction 104, Affinity 96, Attachment 96The Pilgrm: Attraction 105, Affinity 96, Attachment 93The Pilgrm 9998 59% Indifferent 104105 9696 9693 Average on all threeAverage on all three 2%
9 Point A Hotels: Attraction 100, Affinity 96, Attachment 96Point A Hotels: Attraction 101, Affinity 96, Attachment 93Point A Hotels 9797 58% Indifferent 100101 9696 9693 Average on all threeAverage on all three 5%
10 Travelodge: Attraction 95, Affinity 95, Attachment 103Travelodge: Attraction 96, Affinity 96, Attachment 99Travelodge 9797 58% Indifferent 9596 9596 10399 Average on all threeAverage on all three 37%
11 Bloc Hotels: Attraction 98, Affinity 95, Attachment 92Bloc Hotels: Attraction 100, Affinity 96, Attachment 89Bloc Hotels 9695 57% Indifferent 98100 9596 9289 Average on all threeNoticed, not returned to 2%
12 jury's Inn: Attraction 90, Affinity 94, Attachment 91jury's Inn: Attraction 91, Affinity 94, Attachment 88jury's Inn 9291 55% Indifferent 9091 9494 9188 Credible, not first choiceLiked, not chosen 2%
13 easyHotel: Attraction 83, Affinity 87, Attachment 82easyHotel: Attraction 84, Affinity 88, Attachment 79easyHotel 8483 50% Indifferent 8384 8788 8279 Behind on all threeBehind on all three 13%
Rated but never named (15)

The models rated these brands when asked, but none of the category's answers named them.

#Brand Desire indexDesire %Status AttractionAffinityAttachment SummaryNamed in
— DoubleTree by Hilton: Attraction 118, Affinity 121, Attachment 122DoubleTree by Hilton: Attraction 119, Affinity 121, Attachment 118DoubleTree by Hilton 120120 72% Above indifference 118119 121121 122118 Ahead on all threeAhead on all three 0%
— citizenM: Attraction 120, Affinity 109, Attachment 117citizenM: Attraction 121, Affinity 110, Attachment 113citizenM 115115 69% Above indifference 120121 109110 117113 Chosen, not lovedAhead on all three 0%
— Radisson RED: Attraction 118, Affinity 111, Attachment 115Radisson RED: Attraction 120, Affinity 111, Attachment 112Radisson RED 115114 68% Above indifference 118120 111111 115112 Ahead on all threeAhead on all three 0%
— Moxy Hotels: Attraction 120, Affinity 105, Attachment 109Moxy Hotels: Attraction 121, Affinity 105, Attachment 106Moxy Hotels 111111 66% Indifferent 120121 105105 109106 Noticed, not returned toNoticed, not returned to 0%
— Room2: Attraction 108, Affinity 109, Attachment 110Room2: Attraction 109, Affinity 109, Attachment 107Room2 109109 65% Indifferent 108109 109109 110107 Relied on, not excitingAverage on all three 0%
— Novotel: Attraction 104, Affinity 111, Attachment 110Novotel: Attraction 105, Affinity 111, Attachment 106Novotel 108108 65% Indifferent 104105 111111 110106 Credible, not first choiceCredible, not first choice 0%
— YOTEL: Attraction 107, Affinity 99, Attachment 106YOTEL: Attraction 109, Affinity 100, Attachment 102YOTEL 104103 62% Indifferent 107109 99100 106102 Average on all threeAverage on all three 0%
— Treehouse Hotels: Attraction 111, Affinity 94, Attachment 107Treehouse Hotels: Attraction 112, Affinity 94, Attachment 104Treehouse Hotels 104104 62% Indifferent 111112 9494 107104 Noticed, not returned toNoticed, not returned to 0%
— Mercure: Attraction 101, Affinity 107, Attachment 102Mercure: Attraction 102, Affinity 107, Attachment 98Mercure 103102 61% Indifferent 101102 107107 10298 Average on all threeAverage on all three 0%
— Alofts: Attraction 105, Affinity 97, Attachment 100Alofts: Attraction 106, Affinity 98, Attachment 96Alofts 101100 60% Indifferent 105106 9798 10096 Average on all threeAverage on all three 0%
— Best Western: Attraction 93, Affinity 96, Attachment 97Best Western: Attraction 94, Affinity 96, Attachment 94Best Western 9595 57% Indifferent 9394 9696 9794 Average on all threeAverage on all three 0%
— Campanile: Attraction 82, Affinity 88, Attachment 78Campanile: Attraction 83, Affinity 88, Attachment 76Campanile 8382 49% Indifferent 8283 8888 7876 Behind on all threeBehind on all three 0%
— Days Inn: Attraction 69, Affinity 84, Attachment 73Days Inn: Attraction 70, Affinity 84, Attachment 71Days Inn 7575 45% Indifferent 6970 8484 7371 Behind on all threeBehind on all three 0%
— Alhambra Hotel: Attraction 71, Affinity 77, Attachment 68Alhambra Hotel: Attraction 72, Affinity 77, Attachment 66Alhambra Hotel 7272 43% Indifferent 7172 7777 6866 Behind on all threeBehind on all three 0%
— Premier Lodge: Attraction 67, Affinity 76, Attachment 68Premier Lodge: Attraction 68, Affinity 76, Attachment 65Premier Lodge 7070 42% Indifferent 6768 7676 6865 Behind on all threeBehind on all three 0%

Indexed against the average of the 28 indexed budget hotels brands, so 100 is the category average and a brand is read against the rivals it actually competes with.Indexed against the average of every indexed brand in the whole index — 2,582 brands across 67 categories — so 100 is the average brand anywhere here and a number reads the same on every board. 28 budget hotels brands rated by the assistants in the latest weekly run; Named in is the share of 60 AI answers that name each brand.

Feature profile

What this category is rated on

The brands are most divided on emotional magnetism: Moxy Hotels is rated 5.4 and Days Inn 2.5 on the 1–7 scale, a spread of 132 against the feature's usual spread (100 = as contested as usual). Against every category, budget hotels is rated highest on emotional magnetism (109) and lowest on part of my routine (92).

FeatureDriverCategory meanVs all categories
Perceived superiority Attraction 4.3/7 97
Emotional magnetism contested Attraction 4.0/7 109
Positive influence Attraction 4.5/7 99
Identity & belonging Affinity 3.9/7 102
Values & integrity Affinity 4.2/7 101
Trust & legitimacy Affinity 5.0/7 98
Emotional bond Attachment 3.8/7 92
Reinforced experience Attachment 4.2/7 107
Part of my routine Attachment 3.8/7 92

A feature's category mean is the average of its brands' ratings, 1–7. Vs all categories indexes it against every indexed brand across every category (100 = the average brand anywhere). The contested feature is the one the category's brands are most spread on, measured against how spread that feature usually is.

Stated vs revealed

Rated well is not the same as named

Across the 28 brands, how highly the models rate a brand when asked and how often their answers name it barely go together (rank correlation -0.02).

Rated well, rarely named

  • DoubleTree by Hilton72% Desire · named in 0%
  • citizenM69% Desire · named in 0%
  • Radisson RED68% Desire · named in 0%
  • Moxy Hotels66% Desire · named in 0%
  • Room265% Desire · named in 0%

Showing 5 of 13.

Named, not desired

  • Travelodgenamed in 37% · 58% Desire
  • ibisnamed in 23% · 60% Desire
  • easyHotelnamed in 13% · 50% Desire
  • Holiday Innnamed in 5% · 65% Desire
  • Holiday Inn Expressnamed in 5% · 63% Desire

Showing 5 of 6.

Rated well, rarely named: Desire above the category median, named in 5% of answers or fewer. Named, not desired: among the most-named quarter of the category, yet indifferent or below. A relationship inside one week's run, never a cause.

Model agreement

Where the models disagree

The models broadly agree on these brands (mean correlation 0.76 across 3 pairs: ChatGPT–Claude 0.80 · ChatGPT–Gemini 0.78 · Claude–Gemini 0.71). Still, 79 of 868 brand-statement ratings (9%) split by 2 points or more on the 1–7 scale, and the typical brand's Desire differs by 6 points between its most and least generous model.

BrandStatementRated highestRated lowest
Premier LodgeGood value Claude 6 Gemini 2
Room2Sustainability Gemini 7 Claude 3
Premier LodgeAdvocacy Claude 4 Gemini 1
Premier LodgeCustomer experience Claude 5 Gemini 2
Premier LodgeDelivers Claude 5 Gemini 2

The widest 5 of 79 splits.

Across the whole index, on the same brands: Gemini rates +4.5 points of Desire % against its peers; ChatGPT rates −1.7 points of Desire % against its peers; Claude rates −3.0 points of Desire % against its peers. A generous model lifts every brand it rates, which is why scores are combined across models and indexed within the category.

Distinctive statements

What sets the leading brands apart

For the category's leading named brands, the glossary statements each is rated furthest above and below the category's average, in points on the 1–7 scale.

Premier Inn
Above the categoryLeader +2.2, Would miss it +1.9, Peace of mind +1.6
Below the categorySelf-expression −1.1, Exclusive experience −1.1, New ideas −0.8
Holiday Inn
Above the categoryLeader +1.6, Good reputation +1.3, Trust +1.2
Below the categorySelf-expression −0.8, Unique −0.8, New ideas −0.5
Hampton by Hilton
Above the categoryPeace of mind +0.9, Best interests +0.8, Integrity +0.7
Below the categorySelf-expression −0.8, Exclusive experience −0.8, New ideas −0.8
Crowne Plaza
Above the categoryQuality products +0.9, Leader +0.9, Safe products +0.7
Below the categoryGood value −0.9, Simplify −0.5, Wealth −0.5
Holiday Inn Express
Above the categoryLeader +1.2, Simplify +1.2, Delivers +1.0
Below the categoryExclusive experience −1.8, Unique −1.5, New ideas −1.2
Supporting evidence

What the answers say

The category's answers say enough to judge 21 of the 868 brand-statement ratings (2.4%). Of those, 81% back the rating, 0% lean against it and the rest are mixed. The answers were not written to describe every brand on every statement, so this is a check on the ratings, not a second score. Counts only; no answer text is published.

Method & limitations

Every week, ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini are each asked directly, the way a survey asks a respondent, to rate every brand in the category on the 31 statements of the Havas Science of Desire glossary, on the survey's own 1–7 agreement scale. Statements roll up to nine features and the three Drivers of Desire (a feature is the mean of its statements; a driver is the sum of its three features, out of 21; Desire is the sum of the drivers, out of 63). Each brand is indexed against the average brand in its own category — 100 is the category average, 115 is fifteen per cent above it — and the Vs all categories switch re-indexes the same scores against every indexed brand in the index. Desire % is Desire as a share of its maximum. A brand is above indifference when its Desire is above two-thirds of its maximum (42 of 63), below indifference at or under one-third (21), and indifferent in between. The summary beside each brand says where it stands on the three drivers: an index of 110 or more counts as ahead, 90 or less as behind.

These are the assistants' own ratings when asked. They are not a survey of people and not an endorsement, and they are not read from what the assistants happen to say in an answer: the answers to the category's unbranded consumer prompts are used only to count how often each brand is named, and as supporting evidence. Relationships between ratings and how often a brand is named are correlational. A brand is indexed only when all 31 statements have been rated in a run by at least two models, and a category needs at least 4 such brands to get a board. See the full methodology.