Converged.AI × BrandInsightAI
BrandInsightAI Insights
Telecoms · refreshed weekly

How AI wants broadband

Sky is the most desired broadband brand the answers name: Desire 69% of maximum, above indifference. 3% of the 32 brands rated sit above indifference; the rest leave the models indifferent. The category is most divided on perceived superiority. The brand the answers name most often is Virgin Media, not the category's market leader.

32 brands rated · 21 named in the answers · 60 AI answers behind presence · rated by ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini

Attraction Standing out: seen as superior, magnetic and influential.
Affinity Belonging: tied to identity, values and legitimacy, not just specifications.
Attachment Being returned to: an emotional bond, a dependable experience, part of the routine.
AttractionAffinityAttachment Each whorl lights one ring per index threshold cleared (84 / 92 / 100 / 108 / 116)

Indices: 100 = the average brand in the same category.Indices: 100 = the average brand across every category in the index. Desire % and status are absolute and read the same either way.

Broadband

Every brand, named first

3% above indifference · 97% indifferent · 0% below · 32 brands

#Brand Desire indexDesire %Status AttractionAffinityAttachment SummaryNamed in
1 Sky: Attraction 132, Affinity 116, Attachment 136Sky: Attraction 112, Affinity 108, Attachment 124Sky 128114 69% Above indifference 132112 116108 136124 Ahead on all threeChosen, not loved 35%
2 Community Fibre: Attraction 125, Affinity 119, Attachment 122Community Fibre: Attraction 106, Affinity 111, Attachment 111Community Fibre 122109 66% Indifferent 125106 119111 122111 Ahead on all threeCredible, not first choice 18%
3 EE: Attraction 120, Affinity 113, Attachment 123EE: Attraction 102, Affinity 105, Attachment 112EE 119106 64% Indifferent 120102 113105 123112 Ahead on all threeRelied on, not exciting 25%
4 Vodafone: Attraction 112, Affinity 113, Attachment 121Vodafone: Attraction 95, Affinity 105, Attachment 111Vodafone 116104 62% Indifferent 11295 113105 121111 Ahead on all threeRelied on, not exciting 28%
5 Hyperoptic: Attraction 118, Affinity 110, Attachment 116Hyperoptic: Attraction 100, Affinity 102, Attachment 106Hyperoptic 114103 62% Indifferent 118100 110102 116106 Ahead on all threeAverage on all three 23%
6 Zen Internet: Attraction 118, Affinity 119, Attachment 103Zen Internet: Attraction 100, Affinity 110, Attachment 94Zen Internet 113102 61% Indifferent 118100 119110 10394 Credible, not first choiceCredible, not first choice 7%
7 Three: Attraction 114, Affinity 105, Attachment 120Three: Attraction 97, Affinity 98, Attachment 109Three 113101 61% Indifferent 11497 10598 120109 Chosen, not lovedAverage on all three 5%
8 Gigaclear: Attraction 115, Affinity 114, Attachment 111Gigaclear: Attraction 98, Affinity 106, Attachment 102Gigaclear 113102 61% Indifferent 11598 114106 111102 Ahead on all threeAverage on all three 13%
9 CityFibre: Attraction 113, Affinity 110, Attachment 114CityFibre: Attraction 96, Affinity 102, Attachment 104CityFibre 112101 60% Indifferent 11396 110102 114104 Ahead on all threeAverage on all three 17%
10 BT: Attraction 105, Affinity 108, Attachment 112BT: Attraction 89, Affinity 100, Attachment 102BT 10897 58% Indifferent 10589 108100 112102 Relied on, not excitingRelied on, not exciting 40%
11 IDnet: Attraction 100, Affinity 113, Attachment 97IDnet: Attraction 85, Affinity 104, Attachment 88IDnet 10493 56% Indifferent 10085 113104 9788 Credible, not first choiceLiked, not chosen 2%
12 YouFibre: Attraction 103, Affinity 102, Attachment 105YouFibre: Attraction 88, Affinity 94, Attachment 96YouFibre 10393 56% Indifferent 10388 10294 10596 Average on all threeRelied on, not exciting 7%
13 Virgin Media: Attraction 103, Affinity 89, Attachment 117Virgin Media: Attraction 87, Affinity 83, Attachment 107Virgin Media 10292 55% Indifferent 10387 8983 117107 Relied on, not excitingRelied on, not exciting 45%
14 Zzoomm: Attraction 102, Affinity 99, Attachment 99Zzoomm: Attraction 87, Affinity 92, Attachment 91Zzoomm 10090 54% Indifferent 10287 9992 9991 Average on all threeCredible, not first choice 3%
15 Plusnet: Attraction 99, Affinity 100, Attachment 95Plusnet: Attraction 84, Affinity 92, Attachment 87Plusnet 9888 53% Indifferent 9984 10092 9587 Average on all threeLiked, not chosen 18%
16 Toob: Attraction 100, Affinity 98, Attachment 94Toob: Attraction 85, Affinity 91, Attachment 86Toob 9888 53% Indifferent 10085 9891 9486 Average on all threeLiked, not chosen 3%
17 Now Broadband: Attraction 94, Affinity 97, Attachment 99Now Broadband: Attraction 80, Affinity 90, Attachment 91Now Broadband 9787 52% Indifferent 9480 9790 9991 Average on all threeRelied on, not exciting 10%
18 4th Utility: Attraction 89, Affinity 92, Attachment 894th Utility: Attraction 76, Affinity 85, Attachment 814th Utility 9081 48% Indifferent 8976 9285 8981 Liked, not chosenBehind on all three 5%
19 Brsk: Attraction 95, Affinity 89, Attachment 82Brsk: Attraction 81, Affinity 82, Attachment 75Brsk 8979 48% Indifferent 9581 8982 8275 Noticed, not returned toBehind on all three 2%
20 Hey Broadband: Attraction 94, Affinity 88, Attachment 81Hey Broadband: Attraction 80, Affinity 81, Attachment 74Hey Broadband 8879 47% Indifferent 9480 8881 8174 Noticed, not returned toBehind on all three 3%
21 TalkTalk: Attraction 70, Affinity 72, Attachment 77TalkTalk: Attraction 60, Affinity 67, Attachment 70TalkTalk 7366 39% Indifferent 7060 7267 7770 Behind on all threeBehind on all three 20%
Rated but never named (11)

The models rated these brands when asked, but none of the category's answers named them.

#Brand Desire indexDesire %Status AttractionAffinityAttachment SummaryNamed in
— KCOM: Attraction 106, Affinity 115, Attachment 112KCOM: Attraction 90, Affinity 106, Attachment 102KCOM 111100 60% Indifferent 10690 115106 112102 Credible, not first choiceCredible, not first choice 0%
— Fibrus: Attraction 101, Affinity 105, Attachment 103Fibrus: Attraction 86, Affinity 97, Attachment 94Fibrus 10392 55% Indifferent 10186 10597 10394 Average on all threeCredible, not first choice 0%
— G.Network: Attraction 101, Affinity 99, Attachment 99G.Network: Attraction 86, Affinity 92, Attachment 91G.Network 10089 54% Indifferent 10186 9992 9991 Average on all threeCredible, not first choice 0%
— Brawband: Attraction 94, Affinity 101, Attachment 95Brawband: Attraction 80, Affinity 94, Attachment 87Brawband 9787 52% Indifferent 9480 10194 9587 Average on all threeLiked, not chosen 0%
— Cuckoo: Attraction 104, Affinity 93, Attachment 93Cuckoo: Attraction 88, Affinity 86, Attachment 85Cuckoo 9787 52% Indifferent 10488 9386 9385 Average on all threeBehind on all three 0%
— Trooli: Attraction 96, Affinity 93, Attachment 94Trooli: Attraction 81, Affinity 86, Attachment 86Trooli 9484 51% Indifferent 9681 9386 9486 Average on all threeBehind on all three 0%
— Post Office Broadband: Attraction 75, Affinity 95, Attachment 83Post Office Broadband: Attraction 64, Affinity 88, Attachment 76Post Office Broadband 8576 46% Indifferent 7564 9588 8376 Liked, not chosenBehind on all three 0%
— Swish Fibre: Attraction 83, Affinity 83, Attachment 83Swish Fibre: Attraction 71, Affinity 77, Attachment 76Swish Fibre 8374 45% Indifferent 8371 8377 8376 Behind on all threeBehind on all three 0%
— FibreNest: Attraction 80, Affinity 82, Attachment 78FibreNest: Attraction 68, Affinity 76, Attachment 72FibreNest 8172 43% Indifferent 8068 8276 7872 Behind on all threeBehind on all three 0%
— SSE Broadband: Attraction 70, Affinity 89, Attachment 76SSE Broadband: Attraction 60, Affinity 83, Attachment 70SSE Broadband 7971 43% Indifferent 7060 8983 7670 Behind on all threeBehind on all three 0%
— Shell Energy Broadband: Attraction 68, Affinity 76, Attachment 69Shell Energy Broadband: Attraction 58, Affinity 70, Attachment 63Shell Energy Broadband 7164 38% Indifferent 6858 7670 6963 Behind on all threeBehind on all three 0%

Indexed against the average of the 32 indexed broadband brands, so 100 is the category average and a brand is read against the rivals it actually competes with.Indexed against the average of every indexed brand in the whole index — 2,582 brands across 67 categories — so 100 is the average brand anywhere here and a number reads the same on every board. 32 broadband brands rated by the assistants in the latest weekly run; Named in is the share of 60 AI answers that name each brand.

Feature profile

What this category is rated on

The brands are most divided on perceived superiority: Sky is rated 5.3 and Shell Energy Broadband 2.7 on the 1–7 scale, a spread of 114 against the feature's usual spread (100 = as contested as usual). Against every category, broadband is rated highest on emotional bond (103) and lowest on emotional magnetism (77).

FeatureDriverCategory meanVs all categories
Perceived superiority contested Attraction 4.1/7 91
Emotional magnetism Attraction 2.8/7 77
Positive influence Attraction 3.8/7 85
Identity & belonging Affinity 3.7/7 97
Values & integrity Affinity 3.8/7 93
Trust & legitimacy Affinity 4.5/7 89
Emotional bond Attachment 4.2/7 103
Reinforced experience Attachment 3.3/7 85
Part of my routine Attachment 3.6/7 86

A feature's category mean is the average of its brands' ratings, 1–7. Vs all categories indexes it against every indexed brand across every category (100 = the average brand anywhere). The contested feature is the one the category's brands are most spread on, measured against how spread that feature usually is.

Stated vs revealed

Rated well and named go together here

Across the 32 brands, how highly the models rate a brand when asked and how often their answers name it go closely together (rank correlation 0.61).

Rated well, rarely named

  • Three61% Desire · named in 5%
  • KCOM60% Desire · named in 0%
  • IDnet56% Desire · named in 2%
  • Fibrus55% Desire · named in 0%
  • Zzoomm54% Desire · named in 3%

Named, not desired

  • Virgin Medianamed in 45% · 55% Desire
  • BTnamed in 40% · 58% Desire
  • Vodafonenamed in 28% · 62% Desire
  • EEnamed in 25% · 64% Desire
  • Hyperopticnamed in 23% · 62% Desire

Showing 5 of 8.

Rated well, rarely named: Desire above the category median, named in 5% of answers or fewer. Named, not desired: among the most-named quarter of the category, yet indifferent or below. A relationship inside one week's run, never a cause.

Model agreement

Where the models disagree

The models broadly agree on these brands (mean correlation 0.74 across 3 pairs: ChatGPT–Claude 0.66 · ChatGPT–Gemini 0.84 · Claude–Gemini 0.72). Still, 122 of 992 brand-statement ratings (12%) split by 2 points or more on the 1–7 scale, and the typical brand's Desire differs by 9 points between its most and least generous model.

BrandStatementRated highestRated lowest
4th UtilityConnecting ChatGPT 5 Claude 2
BrawbandConnecting ChatGPT 6 Claude 3
BrskConnecting ChatGPT 5 Claude 2
Community FibreConnecting ChatGPT 6 Claude 3
CuckooCustomer experience Gemini 6 ChatGPT 3

The widest 5 of 122 splits.

Across the whole index, on the same brands: Gemini rates +4.5 points of Desire % against its peers; ChatGPT rates −1.7 points of Desire % against its peers; Claude rates −3.0 points of Desire % against its peers. A generous model lifts every brand it rates, which is why scores are combined across models and indexed within the category.

Distinctive statements

What sets the leading brands apart

For the category's leading named brands, the glossary statements each is rated furthest above and below the category's average, in points on the 1–7 scale.

Sky
Above the categoryExclusive experience +3.1, Leader +2.5, Would miss it +2.4
Below the categoryGood value −0.9, Wealth −0.6, Best interests −0.6
Community Fibre
Above the categoryAdvocacy +1.2, Good value +1.1, Would miss it +1.1
Below the categoryExclusive experience −0.2
EE
Above the categoryLeader +1.9, Connecting +1.5, Would miss it +1.4
Below the categoryWealth −0.6, Good value −0.6, Healthy −0.4
Vodafone
Above the categoryLeader +2.2, Connecting +1.5, Would miss it +1.4
Below the categoryGood value −0.6
Hyperoptic
Above the categoryLeader +1.2, Advocacy +1.2, Good reputation +1.1
Below the categoryGood feeling −0.1
Supporting evidence

What the answers say

The category's answers say enough to judge 46 of the 992 brand-statement ratings (4.6%). Of those, 46% back the rating, 7% lean against it and the rest are mixed. The answers were not written to describe every brand on every statement, so this is a check on the ratings, not a second score. Counts only; no answer text is published.

Method & limitations

Every week, ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini are each asked directly, the way a survey asks a respondent, to rate every brand in the category on the 31 statements of the Havas Science of Desire glossary, on the survey's own 1–7 agreement scale. Statements roll up to nine features and the three Drivers of Desire (a feature is the mean of its statements; a driver is the sum of its three features, out of 21; Desire is the sum of the drivers, out of 63). Each brand is indexed against the average brand in its own category — 100 is the category average, 115 is fifteen per cent above it — and the Vs all categories switch re-indexes the same scores against every indexed brand in the index. Desire % is Desire as a share of its maximum. A brand is above indifference when its Desire is above two-thirds of its maximum (42 of 63), below indifference at or under one-third (21), and indifferent in between. The summary beside each brand says where it stands on the three drivers: an index of 110 or more counts as ahead, 90 or less as behind.

These are the assistants' own ratings when asked. They are not a survey of people and not an endorsement, and they are not read from what the assistants happen to say in an answer: the answers to the category's unbranded consumer prompts are used only to count how often each brand is named, and as supporting evidence. Relationships between ratings and how often a brand is named are correlational. A brand is indexed only when all 31 statements have been rated in a run by at least two models, and a category needs at least 4 such brands to get a board. See the full methodology.