Converged.AI × BrandInsightAI
BrandInsightAI Insights
Travel · refreshed weekly

How AI wants long-haul airlines

Long-Haul Airlines is decided on attraction: Emirates indexes 111 there against British Airways at 86, a 25-point spread. Affinity separates almost nobody (7 points across the whole category), so being described that way is table stakes here rather than an advantage. Singapore Airlines holds the strongest overall profile, indexing 109 against the category average: chosen, not loved.

5 brands · 60 AI answers · 43 dimension scores · measured, never estimated

Attraction Standing out in the answer: named first, described as superior, magnetic and influential.
Affinity Belonging in the answer: tied to identity, values and legitimacy, not just specifications.
Attachment Staying in the answer: recommended again, dependable, easy, part of the routine.
AttractionAffinityAttachment Each whorl lights one ring per index threshold cleared (90 / 96 / 102 / 108 / 115)

100 = the average brand in the same category.100 = the average brand across every category in the index.

Travel

Long-Haul Airlines

#Brand AttractionAffinityAttachment SummaryNamed in
1 Singapore Airlines: Attraction 108, Affinity 102, Attachment 107Singapore Airlines: Attraction 106, Affinity 97, Attachment 96Singapore Airlines 108106 10297 10796 Chosen, not lovedNoticed, not returned to 17%
2 Emirates: Attraction 111, Affinity 102, Attachment 106Emirates: Attraction 109, Affinity 97, Attachment 95Emirates 111109 10297 10695 Chosen, not lovedNoticed, not returned to 27%
3 Qatar Airways: Attraction 104, Affinity n/a, Attachment 107Qatar Airways: Attraction 102, Affinity n/a, Attachment 96Qatar Airways 104102 —— 10796 Chosen, not lovedNoticed, not returned to 15%
4 Virgin Atlantic: Attraction 91, Affinity 102, Attachment 93Virgin Atlantic: Attraction 89, Affinity 97, Attachment 84Virgin Atlantic 9189 10297 9384 Liked, not chosenLiked, not chosen 25%
5 British Airways: Attraction 86, Affinity 95, Attachment 87British Airways: Attraction 85, Affinity 90, Attachment 78British Airways 8685 9590 8778 Behind on all threeBehind on all three 40%

Indexed against the average of the 5 indexed long-haul airlines brands, so 100 is the category average and a brand is read against the rivals it actually competes with.Indexed against the average of every indexed brand in the whole index — 1,605 brands across 61 categories — so 100 is the average brand anywhere here and a number reads the same on every board. 5 long-haul airlines brands, measured across 60 AI answers in the latest weekly run.

Driver by driver

Where the category actually separates. A wide spread means assistants describe these brands very differently on that driver; a narrow one means it is table stakes.

Attraction

25-point spread · tracks being named -0.30
Emirates111
British Airways86

The widest field of the three: this is where the category separates.

Attachment

20-point spread · tracks being named -0.87
Singapore Airlines107
British Airways87

Real separation, but not the category’s defining contest.

Affinity

7-point spread
Singapore Airlines102
British Airways95

The tightest of the three: most brands land close together here.

Where each brand stands

Each brand's three indices, summed up in a line: which drivers it is ahead on, which it is behind on, and the one to build next. A brand that is noticed but not returned to has a different problem from one that is relied on but not exciting.

Virgin Atlantic: Attraction 91, Affinity 102, Attachment 93
Liked, not chosen
Affinity is its strongest driver; attachment is below average.
Virgin Atlantic
Build next: attachment
Singapore Airlines: Attraction 108, Affinity 102, Attachment 107
Chosen, not loved
Attraction and attachment are ahead; affinity trails behind them.
Singapore Airlines · Emirates · Qatar Airways
Build next: affinity
British Airways: Attraction 86, Affinity 95, Attachment 87
Behind on all three
Below average on attraction, affinity and attachment.
British Airways
Build next: attraction
Singapore Airlines: Attraction 106, Affinity 97, Attachment 96
Noticed, not returned to
Attraction is its strongest driver; attachment trails behind it.
Singapore Airlines · Emirates · Qatar Airways
Build next: attachment
Virgin Atlantic: Attraction 89, Affinity 97, Attachment 84
Liked, not chosen
Affinity is its strongest driver; attachment is below average.
Virgin Atlantic
Build next: attachment
British Airways: Attraction 85, Affinity 90, Attachment 78
Behind on all three
Below average on attraction, affinity and attachment.
British Airways
Build next: attraction

What assistants actually talk about

The sixteen dimensions underneath the drivers, scored 0–10 on how the answers describe each brand. Spread is the distance between the strongest and weakest brand: the widest are where a brand can still separate itself, the narrowest are the price of entry.

Where brands separate

DimensionDriverCategory avgStrongestSpread
Quality & Performance Attraction 7.4 Singapore Airlines 8.5 2.5
Value & Pricing Attraction 6.4 Emirates 7.3 2.0
Range & Availability Attachment 6.0 Emirates 7.0 2.0
Customer Service & Support Attachment 7.0 Emirates 8.0 1.7
Style & Aesthetic Attraction 7.3 Emirates 8.0 1.5

Where everyone reads alike

DimensionDriverCategory avgStrongestSpread
Heritage & Authority Attraction 6.0 British Airways 6.0 0.0
Reliability & Consistency Affinity 6.9 Virgin Atlantic 7.0 0.5
Leadership & Momentum Attraction 7.3 Singapore Airlines 8.0 1.0
Differentiation vs Sameness Attraction 7.3 Emirates 8.0 1.0
Innovation & Technology Attraction 7.3 Emirates 8.0 1.0

Does desire track being recommended?

Rank correlation between a brand's driver index and the share of answers naming it, across the 5 indexed brands in this category. A relationship inside one run's answers — descriptive, never causal, and easily moved by a single brand at this sample size.

Attraction-0.30
Attachment-0.87

Method & limitations

Every week, each category runs a fixed set of unbranded consumer prompts against ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini. A separate model reads the answers and scores every brand named in them across 16 perception dimensions, 0–10. Those dimensions are grouped into the three Drivers of Desire from the Havas Science of Desire framework, and each brand's driver score is indexed against the average brand in its own category — 100 is the category average, 115 is fifteen per cent above it. The Vs all categories switch re-indexes the same scores against the average of every indexed brand across every category, so boards can be read against each other; the ranking inside a category is the same either way. Each category's own average, indexed against the whole index, is its place in the category table. The summary beside each brand describes where it stands on the three drivers against whichever benchmark is showing: above 104 counts as ahead, below 96 as behind.

This measures how AI assistants describe brands in their answers. It is not a survey of people, and it is not an endorsement: the scores are a reading of machine-generated text at the time of the run, and relationships between drivers and how often a brand is named are correlational. A brand needs at least six scored dimensions in a run to be indexed, and a category needs at least four such brands to get a board. See the full methodology.