Converged.AI × BrandInsightAI
BrandInsightAI Insights
Finance · refreshed weekly

How AI wants business banking

Business Banking is decided on attraction: Monzo indexes 114 there against HSBC at 79, a 35-point spread. Starling Bank holds the strongest overall profile at 111 — complete desire. Across these 11 brands, attachment tracks being named most closely (rank correlation 0.60).

11 brands · 60 AI answers · 147 dimension scores · measured, never estimated

Attraction Standing out in the answer: named first, described as superior, magnetic and influential.
Affinity Belonging in the answer: tied to identity, values and legitimacy, not just specifications.
Attachment Staying in the answer: recommended again, dependable, easy, part of the routine.
AttractionAffinityAttachment Each whorl lights one ring per index threshold cleared (90 / 96 / 102 / 108 / 115)
Finance

Business Banking

#Brand AttractionAffinityAttachment Desire shapeNamed in
1 Starling Bank: Attraction 110, Affinity 108, Attachment 115Starling Bank 110 108 115 Complete desire 38%
2 Monzo: Attraction 114, Affinity 101, Attachment 111Monzo 114 101 111 Performance brand 37%
3 Wise: Attraction 108, Affinity 103, Attachment 111Wise 108 103 111 Performance brand 20%
4 Revolut: Attraction 111, Affinity 88, Attachment 104Revolut 111 88 104 Performance brand 25%
5 ANNA Money: Attraction 104, Affinity 86, Attachment 102ANNA Money 104 86 102 Magnetic but unbought 12%
6 Mettle: Attraction 100, Affinity 90, Attachment 102Mettle 100 90 102 Habit, not love 15%
7 Tide: Attraction 99, Affinity 93, Attachment 104Tide 99 93 104 Habit, not love 35%
8 Airwallex: Attraction 99, Affinity 88, Attachment 100Airwallex 99 88 100 Habit, not love 12%
9 Barclays: Attraction 88, Affinity 121, Attachment 81Barclays 88 121 81 Loved, not chosen 20%
10 NatWest: Attraction 88, Affinity 121, Attachment 81NatWest 88 121 81 Loved, not chosen 20%
11 HSBC: Attraction 79, Affinity 100, Attachment 90HSBC 79 100 90 Loved, not chosen 20%

Indexed against the business banking average of 11 brands (100 = the category), measured across 60 AI answers in the latest weekly run.

Driver by driver

Where the category actually separates. A wide spread means assistants describe these brands very differently on that driver; a narrow one means it is table stakes.

Attraction

35-point spread · tracks being named 0.43
Monzo114
HSBC79

The widest field of the three: this is where the category separates.

Affinity

35-point spread · tracks being named 0.45
Barclays121
ANNA Money86

Real separation, but not the category’s defining contest.

Attachment

34-point spread · tracks being named 0.60
Starling Bank115
NatWest81

The tightest of the three: most brands land close together here.

The shapes AI leaves these brands in

Three indices make a profile, and profiles fall into recognisable shapes. A brand that is magnetic but unbought has a different problem from a habit nobody loves — and a different thing to build next.

Starling Bank: Attraction 110, Affinity 108, Attachment 115
Complete desire
Wanted, belonged-to and repurchased — the rare full spiral.
Starling Bank
Nothing obviously missing.
ANNA Money: Attraction 104, Affinity 86, Attachment 102
Magnetic but unbought
AI admires it and forgets to recommend buying it again.
ANNA Money
Build next: attachment
Mettle: Attraction 100, Affinity 90, Attachment 102
Habit, not love
Recommended for reliability and ease; nobody calls it exciting.
Mettle · Tide · Airwallex
Build next: attraction
Barclays: Attraction 88, Affinity 121, Attachment 81
Loved, not chosen
Identity and values without superiority or habit.
Barclays · NatWest · HSBC
Build next: attachment
Monzo: Attraction 114, Affinity 101, Attachment 111
Performance brand
Superior and dependable, but it belongs to nobody.
Monzo · Wise · Revolut
Build next: affinity

What assistants actually talk about

The sixteen dimensions underneath the drivers, scored 0–10 on how the answers describe each brand. Spread is the distance between the strongest and weakest brand: the widest are where a brand can still separate itself, the narrowest are the price of entry.

Where brands separate

DimensionDriverCategory avgStrongestSpread
Ease of Use & Onboarding Attachment 7.4 ANNA Money 9.0 5.0
Heritage & Authority Affinity 6.1 Barclays 9.0 5.0
Boldness & Creativity Attraction 7.3 Monzo 8.5 4.5
Value & Pricing Attachment 7.1 Starling Bank 8.7 3.7
Differentiation vs Sameness Attraction 7.6 Revolut 8.5 3.5

Where everyone reads alike

DimensionDriverCategory avgStrongestSpread
Customer Service & Support Attachment 7.3 Monzo 8.0 1.0
Range & Availability Attachment 7.8 HSBC 8.5 1.5
Reliability & Consistency Attachment 7.7 Starling Bank 8.7 1.7
Sustainability & Ethics Affinity 7.0 Starling Bank 8.0 2.0
Trust & Credibility Affinity 7.8 Starling Bank 9.0 2.0

Does desire track being recommended?

Rank correlation between a brand's driver index and the share of answers naming it, across the 11 indexed brands in this category. A relationship inside one run's answers — descriptive, never causal, and easily moved by a single brand at this sample size.

Attraction0.43
Affinity0.45
Attachment0.60

Method & limitations

Every week, each category runs a fixed set of unbranded consumer prompts against ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini. A separate model reads the answers and scores every brand named in them across 16 perception dimensions, 0–10. Those dimensions are grouped into the three Drivers of Desire from the Havas Science of Desire framework, and each brand's driver score is indexed against the average of every scored brand in its category — 100 is the category, 115 is fifteen per cent above it.

This measures how AI assistants describe brands in their answers. It is not a survey of people, and it is not an endorsement: the scores are a reading of machine-generated text at the time of the run, and relationships between drivers and how often a brand is named are correlational. A brand needs at least six scored dimensions in a run to be indexed, and a category needs at least four such brands to get a board. See the full methodology.