BrandInsightAI Insights
Technology · a live data story

Accounting Software,
according to AI

Every week we ask ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini the questions real UK consumers ask about accounting software — and record exactly which brands they put forward. Right now, Emma owns the conversation.

0 AI answers this run · 0 brands named · measured, never estimated

The podium

Emma is the default answer.

Named in 27% of accounting software answers, typically in position 2.1. Xero follows at 23%, QuickBooks at 22%.

Xero
23% of answers
Emma
27% of answers
QuickBooks
22% of answers
The full board

Every brand AI names, ranked.

Visibility is the share of answers naming the brand; citation share is its slice of all brand-owned pages cited; read→cited is how often its pages convert a read into a citation.

#BrandVisibilityAvg. positionCitation shareRead→cited
1Emma 27% 2.1 23% 32%
2Xero 23% 2.0 0%
3QuickBooks 22% 2.3 13% 17%
4QuickBooks Self-Employed 22% 2.3 0%
5Snoop 22% 2.3 15% 71%
6YNAB 22% 2.6 8% 33%
7Monzo 18% 2.2 10% 12%
8FreeAgent 18% 2.7 3% 33%
9Starling Bank 15% 3.9 5% 29%
10Sage 13% 4.1 3% 11%
11Monarch Money 7% 1.5 0% 0%
12Receipt Bank 7% 4.5 0%
13Money Dashboard 5% 3.3 0%
14GoSimpleTax 5% 3.7 0%
15Revolut 3% 2.0 0% 0%
Who AI trusts here

The referees of accounting software.

The independent sources AI models cite when answering accounting software questions — the places a brand needs to be seen, reviewed and ranked.

gov.uk 29 cites
google.com 21 cites
which.co.uk 9 cites
reddit.com 6 cites
openbanking.org.uk 5 cites
aureli.app 4 cites
landlordstudio.com 4 cites
wealthr.co.uk 4 cites
youtube.com 4 cites
bankreconciler.app 3 cites
Read is not cited

Snoop converts reads into citations. Sage doesn't.

When Claude or ChatGPT opens a brand's own pages while answering, does the page make the cited-sources list? Snoop converts 71% of reads; Sage just 11%. That gap is a content problem, not a visibility problem.

Snoop · read 7×71%
YNAB · read 9×33%
FreeAgent · read 3×33%
Emma · read 22×32%
Starling Bank · read 7×29%
QuickBooks · read 18×17%
Monzo · read 25×12%
Sage · read 9×11%
Full data table
#BrandVisibilityAvg. positionCitation shareRead→cited
1Emma27%2.123%32%
2Xero23%2.00%
3QuickBooks22%2.313%17%
4QuickBooks Self-Employed22%2.30%
5Snoop22%2.315%71%
6YNAB22%2.68%33%
7Monzo18%2.210%12%
8FreeAgent18%2.73%33%
9Starling Bank15%3.95%29%
10Sage13%4.13%11%
11Monarch Money7%1.50%0%
12Receipt Bank7%4.50%
13Money Dashboard5%3.30%
14GoSimpleTax5%3.70%
15Revolut3%2.00%0%
Which AI you ask

Three models. Three different answers.

Ask about accounting software and the brand you are shown depends on the assistant: Claude → YNAB, Gemini → Xero, ChatGPT → Emma. Their top-five lists share just 25% of names.

Claude recommends
YNAB
named in 20% of its answers
Gemini recommends
Xero
named in 40% of its answers
ChatGPT recommends
Emma
named in 30% of its answers

Brands whose visibility swings most between models — the bar per model, widest gap on the right.

Xero 25pp
Monzo 25pp
Monarch Money 20pp
Emma 20pp
QuickBooks Self-Employed 20pp
QuickBooks 20pp
Snoop 20pp
FreeAgent 20pp
ClaudeGeminiChatGPT
The data behind this chart
BrandClaudeGeminiChatGPTSpread
Xero15%40%15%25pp
Monzo5%30%20%25pp
Monarch Money20%0%0%20pp
Emma15%35%30%20pp
QuickBooks Self-Employed15%35%15%20pp
QuickBooks15%35%15%20pp
Snoop10%30%25%20pp
FreeAgent10%30%15%20pp
Receipt Bank0%20%0%20pp
Sage15%20%5%15pp
Keep exploring

Nineteen more categories.

Method: 20 unbranded consumer prompts per category, spread across the buying journey, run weekly against ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini. Read→cited uses Claude and ChatGPT only (Gemini does not separate the two). Correlational observations of model behaviour at the time of the run. Data from the run completed Tue, 01 Sep 2026 13:39:37 GMT.

scroll ↓