BrandInsightAI Insights
The Category Report · within Property

Property,
sub-category by sub-category

3 property categories, each asked the questions real UK consumers ask, every month. Do they behave like one market or several? On the measures below, Property behaves like a family.

0
alikeness — 100 means the sub-categories are indistinguishable on every measure; 0 means as far apart as any two categories in the programme
Alike or apart

They agree on model agreement. They split on concentration.

Each strip is one measure. The grey band is the programme's full range; the gold span is where Property's sub-categories sit inside it, one dot each. A ratio under 1 means they cluster tighter than the programme — a category with a shared logic — and over 1 means they are further apart than categories chosen at random.

Concentration · 28% to 69%1.20× · apart
19% · programme lowprogramme high · 89%
share of mentions the top three brands take. Spread here vs across all categories.
Leader visibility · 13% to 28%0.31× · alike
5% · programme lowprogramme high · 90%
share of answers naming the leading brand. Spread here vs across all categories.
Read → cited · 37% to 50%0.45× · alike
0% · programme lowprogramme high · 61%
brand pages cited once read. Spread here vs across all categories.
Model agreement · 50% to 50%0.00× · alike
0% · programme lowprogramme high · 100%
how far the three models share a leader. Spread here vs across all categories.
The data behind this chart
MeasureSub-categoryValueWithin-category spreadProgramme spreadRatio
ConcentrationProperty Portals & Agents69%17.514.61.20
Solar & Heat Pumps38%
Fitted Kitchens28%
Leader visibilityProperty Portals & Agents28%7.122.70.31
Solar & Heat Pumps13%
Fitted Kitchens13%
Read → citedSolar & Heat Pumps50%5.311.80.45
Property Portals & Agents43%
Fitted Kitchens37%
Model agreementProperty Portals & Agents50%0.034.10.00
Solar & Heat Pumps50%
Fitted Kitchens50%
The crowns

3 crowns, 3 different heads.

The most-named brand in each sub-category's answers. No brand leads more than one sub-category here — each is its own contest. 2 of the 3 leaders are upsets: not the market leader the programme seeded.

Shared referees

3 sources referee more than one property category.

The independent sources AI cites in the answers — counted only where they appear in the top sources of at least two of Property's sub-categories. google.com is trusted across 3 of 3: the place a property brand needs to be seen whatever it sells.

google.com 3 of 3 · 100
gov.uk 2 of 3 · 54
reddit.com 2 of 3 · 8
Read is not cited

Brand pages convert 50% of reads in solar & heat pumps, 37% in fitted kitchens.

When Claude or ChatGPT opens a brand's own page while answering, how often does it make the cited sources? Property's sub-categories convert alike — a shared content problem, or a shared solution.

Keep exploring

Every property story, and every other category.

Method: every sub-category runs 20 unbranded consumer prompts monthly against ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini. Alikeness compares each measure's spread within Property to its spread across every category in the programme (population standard deviations); model agreement is the share of models naming the same leader; read→cited uses Claude and ChatGPT only. Correlational observations of model behaviour at the time of each run. Data updated Wed, 02 Sep 2026 05:12:05 GMT.

scroll ↓