623,900
Total citations analyzed
18,734
Sponsored links found
7
AI models covered

Top sources driving AI search answers

Across 623,900 citations, the top 15 sources account for 9.3% of everything AI models referenced. youtube.com leads the index with 11,792 citations, representing a share of 1.9% and a previous share of 1.4%, giving a change of 0.4 percentage points. facebook.com follows closely with 9,371 citations, amounting to a 1.5% share after rising 1.1 percentage points from 0.4%.

Figure 1Share of all AI citations — top sources
Share of all AI citations — top sources youtube.com: 1.9% youtube.com 1.9% facebook.com: 1.5% facebook.com 1.5% reddit.com: 1.5% reddit.com 1.5% instagram.com: 1.2% instagram.com 1.2% google.com: 0.7% google.com 0.7% linkedin.com: 0.5% linkedin.com 0.5% tiktok.com: 0.4% tiktok.com 0.4% wikipedia.org: 0.4% wikipedia.org 0.4% carwow.co.uk: 0.2% carwow.co.uk 0.2% which.co.uk: 0.2% which.co.uk 0.2%
Share of 623,900 citations across 7 models.
Data table
Seriesshare
youtube.com1.9%
facebook.com1.5%
reddit.com1.5%
instagram.com1.2%
google.com0.7%
linkedin.com0.5%
tiktok.com0.4%
wikipedia.org0.4%
carwow.co.uk0.2%
which.co.uk0.2%

Quarter on quarter movement in domain visibility

Movement between the latest 13 weeks and the previous 13 weeks shows distinct shifts in AI referencing behavior. facebook.com rose 1.1pts quarter on quarter, moving from a 0.4% share to 1.5%. instagram.com also saw substantial movement, climbing 0.9 percentage points to reach a 1.2% share with 7,621 citations. Meanwhile, google.com dipped 0.1 percentage points to 0.7%.

Figure 2Citation share, quarter on quarter
Citation share, quarter on quarter○ previous quarter ● this quarter facebook.com: 0.4% → 1.5% facebook.com 0.4% → 1.5% instagram.com: 0.3% → 1.2% instagram.com 0.3% → 1.2% youtube.com: 1.4% → 1.9% youtube.com 1.4% → 1.9% linkedin.com: 0.1% → 0.5% linkedin.com 0.1% → 0.5% reddit.com: 1.2% → 1.5% reddit.com 1.2% → 1.5%
Latest 13 complete weeks vs the 13 before. Rising rows gained share.
Data table
Seriesprevious quarterthis quarterChange
facebook.com0.4%1.5%+1.1pp
instagram.com0.3%1.2%+0.9pp
youtube.com1.4%1.9%+0.5pp
linkedin.com0.1%0.5%+0.4pp
reddit.com1.2%1.5%+0.3pp

Model-specific citation favourites

Different AI models display distinct source preferences across their respective citation totals. Perplexity accumulated 172,926 citations, with facebook.com leading at 3.1% share and instagram.com at 3%. Gemini recorded 150,31 citations, favoring youtube.com at 1.4% and reddit.com at 1.3%. Google AIO reached 72,044 citations, placing youtube.com first with a 4.4% share.

Citation half-life and survival rates

Of domains newly earning AI citations, survival rates track their persistence over subsequent weeks. In the cohort of 427 domains measured at afterWeeks four, 20.6% are still being cited four weeks later. At afterWeeks one, 44% of 434 cohort domains retained citations, while at afterWeeks twelve, 17.7% of 395 domains remained in the index.

Figure 3Citation survival: still cited N weeks after first appearing
Citation survival: still cited N weeks after first appearing 0% 50% 100%100% first week44% 1w26.9% 2w20.6% 4w33.8% 8w17.7% 12w The four-week cliff 79% of newcomers have stopped being cited
Pooled cohorts of domains whose first week cleared the citation floor. 100% = every newly cited domain kept earning citations. Step widths follow the real horizon spacing.
Data table
Seriesfirst week1w2w4w8w12w
Still cited100%44%26.9%20.6%33.8%17.7%

The four-week cliff — 79% of newcomers have stopped being cited (4w)

Full report availability and access

The complete analysis covering all 623,900 citations, 7 AI models, and detailed domain metrics is available as a PDF and PPTX download directly on the BrandInsightAI Source Index page for marketing and SEO professionals.

Figure 4Of every 100 AI citations
Of every 100 AI citationsOf every 100 AI citations… 2 go to youtube.com 2 go to facebook.com 2 go to reddit.com 1 goes to instagram.com 1 goes to google.com 1 goes to linkedin.com 91 go everywhere else
Each square is one citation in every hundred, across 623,900 citations and 7 models. Shares round to whole squares.
Data table
SeriesUnits per 100
youtube.com1.9
facebook.com1.5
reddit.com1.5
instagram.com1.2
google.com0.7
linkedin.com0.5

Method & limitations

  • The data reflects observed citation patterns across 7 AI models over a 13-week window and does not imply direct causation or official endorsement by any platform.
  • Changes in model interfaces or underlying retrieval systems can influence citation shares between measurement periods.

How every figure on this page is counted, floored and reviewed: our methodology.