Converged.AI × BrandInsightAI
Live · updated hourly

Most-cited websites by ChatGPT Web

The publishers and platforms ChatGPT Web actually reaches for when it answers — ranked by citation share, with weekly movement.

Rolling 4 weeks: 1,922 citations · 190 model responses · every named domain seen across ≥ 2 independent projects

Top-50 stability: 18% retained week to week — a fast-changing source list

This week's movers

Citation-share change, week commencing 2026-08-10 vs 2026-08-17. Minimum 25 citations in both weeks and a 0.2pp move to qualify — domains newly added to monitoring don't count as movers.

Gaining

No qualifying gainers this week.

Declining

No qualifying decliners this week.

ChatGPT Web's top sources

Top 43 domains by share of all citations in the rolling window. The trend column is the weekly share trajectory.

#DomainShareCitationsTrend
1 reddit.com 2.1% 40
2 runnersworld.com 1.1% 22
3 facebook.com 1.0% 20
4 rtings.com 0.9% 18
5 doctorsofrunning.com 0.8% 15
6 youtube.com 0.8% 15
7 fleetfeet.com 0.7% 13
8 solereview.com 0.6% 12
9 nike.com 0.6% 11
10 outdoorgearlab.com 0.5% 9
11 asics.com 0.4% 7
12 brooksrunning.com 0.4% 7
13 nih.gov 0.3% 6
14 believeintherun.com 0.3% 6
15 sportsdirect.com 0.3% 6
16 womanandhome.com 0.3% 6
17 which.co.uk 0.3% 6
18 rei.com 0.3% 5
19 adidas.co.uk 0.3% 5
20 decathlon.co.uk 0.3% 5
21 tomsguide.com 0.3% 5
22 newbalance.com 0.3% 5
23 gq-magazine.co.uk 0.2% 4
24 runtothefinish.com 0.2% 4
25 glamourmagazine.co.uk 0.2% 4
26 strideauthority.com 0.2% 4
27 nhs.uk 0.2% 4
28 goodhousekeeping.com 0.2% 3
29 standard.co.uk 0.2% 3
30 outsideonline.com 0.2% 3
31 adidas.com 0.2% 3
32 runnersblueprint.com 0.2% 3
33 run-cadence.com 0.2% 3
34 gymshark.com 0.2% 3
35 newbalance.co.uk 0.2% 3
36 forbes.com 0.2% 3
37 theruntesters.com 0.2% 3
38 merriam-webster.com 0.1% 2
39 realsimple.com 0.1% 2
40 menshealth.com 0.1% 2
41 marathonsports.com 0.1% 2
42 runnersneed.com 0.1% 2
43 cambridge.org 0.1% 2

How sourced are the answers?

Citations per response over the last 12 complete weeks — whether the models are leaning on the web more or less.

Figure 1Citations per answer, week by week
Citations per answer, week by weekChatGPTChatGPT, 1 Jun: 2.5ChatGPT, 8 Jun: 2.9ChatGPT, 15 Jun: 2.9ChatGPT, 22 Jun: 3ChatGPT, 29 Jun: 2.7ChatGPT, 6 Jul: 3ChatGPT, 13 Jul: 3.1ChatGPT, 20 Jul: 2.6ChatGPT, 27 Jul: 2.8ChatGPT, 3 Aug: 5ChatGPT, 10 Aug: 3.7ChatGPT, 17 Aug: 41 Jun 17 Aug 2.5 → 5
Each cell is one model in one week; hotter cells mean answers leaned on more sources. Single-hue ramp — the scale runs from the lowest to the highest cell shown.
Data table
Series1 Jun8 Jun15 Jun22 Jun29 Jun6 Jul13 Jul20 Jul27 Jul3 Aug10 Aug17 Aug
ChatGPT2.52.92.932.733.12.62.853.74

Methodology

  • What's counted: every citation/source URL ChatGPT Web returned across the rolling 4 ISO weeks, aggregated from every analysis run on BrandInsightAI. Citations deduplicate to one registrable domain per model response.
  • Quality gate: a domain must appear across ≥ 2 distinct projects to be named; shares are computed against ALL citations in scope, so the gate hides names, never distorts percentages.
  • Movers: week-over-week comparisons use the two most recent COMPLETE ISO weeks (2026-08-10 → 2026-08-17); the in-progress week is excluded because it refreshes hourly, and a domain must clear the citation floor in BOTH weeks — so a newly monitored category entering the dataset never shows up as a gainer.
  • Freshness: the snapshot behind this page recomputes every hour. All figures are measured, never estimated.